1979
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(79)90006-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo covalent binding of organic chemicals to DNA as a quantitative indicator in the process of chemical carcinogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
124
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
7
124
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, line 1 of Table I shows that after a dose of 2.6 · 10 6 dpm/kg body weight a specific activity of 89 • 10 6 dpm/kg DNA resulted. A similar accumulation can be observed with the methylation of liver DNA by dimethylnitrosamine [7] and is an indication of strong carcinogenicity of the compound under investigation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, line 1 of Table I shows that after a dose of 2.6 · 10 6 dpm/kg body weight a specific activity of 89 • 10 6 dpm/kg DNA resulted. A similar accumulation can be observed with the methylation of liver DNA by dimethylnitrosamine [7] and is an indication of strong carcinogenicity of the compound under investigation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…AFM 1 • The CBI for rat liver DNA has been shown to correlate semiquantitatively with the carcinogenic potency of a compound [7] 0 It was shown that a CBI of 10 3 -10 4 stands for strong hepatocarcinogens, a CBI of 10 2 for moderate, and of about ten for weak hepatocarcinogens. An extensive discussion [ 7] of the predictive value of a CBI revealed that a comparison of structurally related chemieals like AFB 1 and AF!\1t can very well be based quantitatively upon measurement of DNA bindingo…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TD 50 values were taken from Gold et al (1984) and were converted to molar units. CBI values for liver DNA were from the review by Lutz (1979) and from more recent original publications (see legend to Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Carcinogenic Potency Of Mutagensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a single dose of 36 mg DENA/kg body weight, there will be about one 0 6 -ethylguanine per 10 5 DNA guanines, at a time between 6 and 12 h after oral administration (Scherer et al, 1977). A similar Ievel of RNA darnage can be expected (Lutz, 1979). A maximum rate of variant Tyr incorporation of 20/2 x 10-5 = 10-4 can be calculated from the two triplets coding for 20 Cys residues in MT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%