SummaryImmune surveillance against tumors usually depends on T cell recognition of tumor antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, whereas MHC class I tumors may be controlled by natural killer (NK) cells. Perforin-dependent cytotoxicity is a major effector function ofCD8 + MHC class I-restricted T cells and of NK cells. Here, we used perforin-deficient C57BL/6 (PKO) mice to study involvement of perforin and Fas ligand in tumor surveillance in vivo.We induced tumors in PKO and normal C57BL/6 mice by (a) injection of different syngeneic tumor cell lines of different tissue origin in naive and primed mice; (b) administration of the chemical carcinogens methylcholanthrene (MCA) or 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetare (TPA) plus 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA), or (c) by injection of acutely oncogenic Moloney sarcoma virus. The first set of models analyzes the defense against a tumor load given at once, whereas the last two sets give information on immune defense against tumors at the very moment of their generation. Most of the tumor cell lines tested were eliminated 10-100-fold better by C57BL/6 mice in an unprimed situation; after priming, the differences were more pronounced. Lymphoma cells transfected with Fas were controlled 10-fold better by PKO and C57BL/6 mice when compared to untransfected control cells, indicating some role for FasL in tumor control. MCA-induced tumors arose more rapidly and with a higher incidence in PKO mice compared to C57BL/6 or CDS-deficient mice. DMBA+TPA-induced skin papillomas arose with similar high incidence and comparable kinetics in both mouse strains. C57BL/6 and PKO mice have a similar incidence ofMoloney murine sarcoma and leukemia virus-induced sarcomas, but tumors are larger and regression is retarded in PKO mice.Thus, perform-dependent cytotoxicity is not only a crucial mechanism of both cytotoxic T lymphocyte-and NK-dependent resistance to injected tumor cell lines, but also operates during viral and chemical carcinogenesis in vivo. Experiments addressing the role of Fasdependent cytotoxlcity by studying resistance to tumor cell lines that were stably transfected with Fas neither provided evidence for a major role of Fas nor excluded a minor contribution of Fas in tumor surveillance.

Dose-response curves for the first interaction of a chemical with a biochemical target molecule are usually monotonic; i.e., they increase or decrease over the entire dose range. However, for reactions of a complex biological system to a toxicant, nonmonotonic (biphasic) dose-effect relationships can be observed, showing a decrease at low dose followed by an increase at high dose, or vice versa. We present four examples to demonstrate that nonmonotonic dose-response relationships can result from superimposition of monotonic dose responses of component biological reactions. Examples include (i) a membrane-receptor model with receptor subtypes of different ligand affinity and opposing downstream effects (adenosine receptors A1 vs. A2), (ii) androgen receptor-mediated gene expression driven by homodimers, but not mixed-ligand dimers, (iii) repair of background DNA damage by enzymatic activity induced by adducts formed by a xenobiotic, (iv) rate of mutation as a consequence of DNA damage times rate of cell division, the latter being modulated by cell-cycle delay at low-level DNA damage, and cell-cycle acceleration due to regenerative hyperplasia at cytotoxic dose levels. Quantitative analyses based on biological models are shown, and factors that affect the degree of nonmonotonicity are identified. It is noted that threshold-type dose-response curves could in fact be nonmonotonic. Our analysis should promote a scientific discussion of biphasic dose responses and the concept termed "hormesis," and of default procedures for low-dose extrapolation in toxicological risk assessment.

No abstract

No abstract