2021
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202100167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo detection of head and neck tumors by hyperspectral imaging combined with deep learning methods

Abstract: Currently, there are no fast and accurate screening methods available for head and neck cancer, the eighth most common tumor entity. For this study, we used hyperspectral imaging, an imaging technique for quantitative and objective surface analysis, combined with deep learning methods for automated tissue classification. As part of a prospective clinical observational study, hyperspectral datasets of laryngeal, hypopharyngeal and oropharyngeal mucosa were recorded in 98 patients before surgery in vivo. We esta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while HSI was found to be more accurate in detecting cancer margins in conventional squamous cell HNC across nearly all contexts, autofluorescence proved to be superior in most aspects of HPV-positive HNC margin detection. In a smaller in vivo experiment of 24 subjects utilizing HSI imaging coupled with a 3D reconstructive algorithm, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in determining tumorous tissues against healthy samples were found to be 81.3%, 83.3%, and 79.2%, respectively [ 46 ]. Similarly with other in vivo studies, limitations of this investigation included motion artifact and image noise from unamenable causes, such as patient pulse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while HSI was found to be more accurate in detecting cancer margins in conventional squamous cell HNC across nearly all contexts, autofluorescence proved to be superior in most aspects of HPV-positive HNC margin detection. In a smaller in vivo experiment of 24 subjects utilizing HSI imaging coupled with a 3D reconstructive algorithm, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in determining tumorous tissues against healthy samples were found to be 81.3%, 83.3%, and 79.2%, respectively [ 46 ]. Similarly with other in vivo studies, limitations of this investigation included motion artifact and image noise from unamenable causes, such as patient pulse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral imaging [5,[42][43][44][45][46] Makes use of extended spectral information from tissues, outside the limited range of RGB wavelengths. This allows for the generation of a 2D image with a corresponding 3D dataset on wavelengths (hyperspectral cube).…”
Section: Similar Weaknesses As Nbimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halicek et al [8] developed a CNN classifier to diagnose head and neck cancer using pre-processed HSI with 78% AUC across a spectral range of 450 nm to 900 nm. But in contrast to [5] and our investigation, the tumor categorization was done ex-vivo. Furthermore, none of these past works used HS cube at a low spatial resolution as they are realistic in the clinical application and used in our study, nor a U-Net.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although HSI thus is promising, there are relatively few works of Deep Learning in HSI. Eggert et al [5] were able to predict in-vivo laryngeal cancer with a 2D CNN, and normal tissue within a spectral range of 380 nm to 680 nm in the visible spectrum and obtain an average AUC of 79%. However, longer wavelengths are favorable according to [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have demonstrated the ability of HSI to detect a wide range of diseases, such as oximetry of the retinal ( Gao et al, 2012 ; Hadoux et al, 2019 ; Lim et al, 2021 ), intestinal ischemia identification ( Barberio et al, 2020 ; Mehdorn et al, 2020 ), histopathological tissue analysis ( Khouj et al, 2018 ), detecting cancer metastases in lung and lymph node tissue ( Zhang et al, 2021 ), blood vessel visualization enhancement ( Bjorgan et al, 2015 ; Fouad Aref et al, 2021 ), identifying skin tumors ( Leon et al, 2020 ; Courtenay et al, 2021 ), evaluating the cholesterol levels ( Milanic et al, 2015 ), diabetic foot, etc. In the field of oncology, HSI technology has been successfully applied to detect head and neck cancer ( Halicek et al, 2017 ; Eggert et al, 2022 ), thyroid and salivary glands ( Halicek et al, 2020 ), gastric cancer ( Li et al, 2019 ; Liu et al, 2020a ), oral cancer ( Jeyaraj et al, 2020 ), colon cancer ( Baltussen et al, 2019 ; Manni, 2020 ; Maktabi, 2021 ) as well as breast cancer ( Kho et al, 2019 ; Aboughaleb et al, 2020 ). Previously, other authors have published comprehensive overviews concerning the application of HSI in gastroenterology ( Ortega et al, 2019 ), wound care ( Saiko et al, 2020 ) or breast cancer therapy and diagnosis ( Aref et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%