1985
DOI: 10.1021/bi00347a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo effects of cis- and trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) on SV40 chromosomes: differential repair, DNA-protein crosslinking, and inhibition of replication

Abstract: The mechanism of action of the antitumor drug cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), cis-DDP, was investigated by using the approximately 5200 base pair (bp) chromosome of simian virus 40 (SV40) as an in vivo chromatin model. Comparative studies were also carried out with the clinically ineffective isomer trans-DDP. Although 14 times more trans- than cis-DDP in the culture medium is required to inhibit SV40 DNA replication in SV40-infected green monkey CV-1 cells, the two isomers are equally effective at inhibiting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
113
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other investigations increased DNA repair synthesis induced by cis-DDP has been demonstrated in resistant tumor cells (25,26,27). It has been proposed that the lower cytotoxicity of trans-DDP is due to a more rapid repair of trans-than cis-DDP-DNA adducts (28), but other investigators have been unable to find any difference in the rate of removal of cis-DDP and trans-DDP adducts from the DNA of mammalian cells (29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In other investigations increased DNA repair synthesis induced by cis-DDP has been demonstrated in resistant tumor cells (25,26,27). It has been proposed that the lower cytotoxicity of trans-DDP is due to a more rapid repair of trans-than cis-DDP-DNA adducts (28), but other investigators have been unable to find any difference in the rate of removal of cis-DDP and trans-DDP adducts from the DNA of mammalian cells (29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It would seem possible, then, that DAC-induced hypomethylation might reveal additional cDDP binding sites, particularly in GC-rich regions such as occur frequently in eukaryotic promotors and other regulatory sites. In favour of such suggestion is the observation that increased protein binding to DNA was found at hemymethylated sites after DAC treatment (Michalowsky & Jones, 1987); since cDDP crosslinks both proteins and DNA (Ciccarelli et al, 1985) such sites could provide for an excellent substrate for cDDP binding. However, against this explanation is the fact that we were able to demonstrate synergy between DAC and cDDP in a system where further hypomethylation could not occur, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[For a more extensive discussion of the structure activity-relationship of platinum(II) complexes, the reader is referred to reviews in the literature [-26-30].] The great differences in the antitumor activities of the stereoisomers of diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin is a very potent drug, transplatin is ineffective) are attributed to a faster repair of the transplatin-DNA lesions [31][32][33][34]. The repair-resistant intrastrand crosslinks are formed by cisplatin but not by its trans isomer, for stereochemical reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrastrand crosslinks, especially between adjacent guanosine molecules, are not efficiently recognized and repaired. Therefore they accumulate in the DNA leading to the antitumor effect of cisplatin [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%