2016
DOI: 10.1038/nature20565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration

Abstract: Targeted genome editing via engineered nucleases is an exciting area of biomedical research and holds potential for clinical applications. Despite rapid advances in the field, in vivo targeted transgene integration is still infeasible because current tools are inefficient1, especially for non-dividing cells, which compose most adult tissues. This poses a barrier for uncovering fundamental biological principles and developing treatments for a broad range of genetic disorders2. Based on clustered regularly inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
971
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 984 publications
(1,033 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
25
971
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for most clinical treatments or precise modeling of diseases in vitro, it is essential to achieve high-frequency knock-in of the repair template with the desired variant. Notably, since microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ)-assisted gene knock-in named PITCh (Precise Integration into Target Chromosome) [103,104] and NHEJ-mediated sitespecific gene insertion, HITI [68], are both HDRindependent precise knock-in methods, these strategies may increase the utility of genome editing in human cultured cells. Other techniques to enhance gene knock-in include inhibition of NHEJ with small compounds or Cas9 protein accumulation in an S-and G 2 -phase-dependent manner [105][106][107][108][109].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, for most clinical treatments or precise modeling of diseases in vitro, it is essential to achieve high-frequency knock-in of the repair template with the desired variant. Notably, since microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ)-assisted gene knock-in named PITCh (Precise Integration into Target Chromosome) [103,104] and NHEJ-mediated sitespecific gene insertion, HITI [68], are both HDRindependent precise knock-in methods, these strategies may increase the utility of genome editing in human cultured cells. Other techniques to enhance gene knock-in include inhibition of NHEJ with small compounds or Cas9 protein accumulation in an S-and G 2 -phase-dependent manner [105][106][107][108][109].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HITI-mediated transgene knock-in occurs more preferentially in the forward than in the reverse direction because the forward-directed transgene knock-in alters the genomic gRNA target sequence to prevent additional CRISPR/Cas9 cutting. Suzuki et al demonstrated that HITI worked in HEK293 cells and postmitotic neurons, and that HITI introduced the wild-type exon to rescue visual function using a rat model of retinitis pigmentosa as a proof of concept of its potential use for gene correction therapy [68].…”
Section: Nhej-mediated Knock-in Using Crisprobligare or Hitimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this regard, Suzuki et al have recently reported that CRISPR/Cas9 systems achieved knock-in into the target Tubb3 locus in non-dividing mouse primary neuronal cells by homology-independent targeted integration (HITI) using plasmid-mediated and AAV vector-mediated delivery. 36) However, the efficiency was not high possibly because of the nature of Cas9 that it generates DSB with blunt ends. DSB with blunt ends mainly allows homology-directed repairs (HDRs) which barely occur in non-dividing cells, 37) leading to the observed low efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%