2020
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo High-Content Screening in Zebrafish for Developmental Nephrotoxicity of Approved Drugs

Abstract: Despite widespread drug exposure, for example during gestation or in prematurely born children, organ-specific developmental toxicity of most drugs is poorly understood. Developmental and functional abnormalities are a major cause of kidney diseases during childhood; however, the potential causal relationship to exposure with nephrotoxic drugs during nephrogenesis is widely unknown. To identify developmental nephrotoxic drugs in a large scale, we established and performed an automated high-content screen to sc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, these model organisms are not easily usable in high‐throughput assays and even in the era of CRISPR/Cas9 genetic manipulation is rather difficult and time‐consuming. In the zebrafish model, the small larval size and conserved morphology of the pronephros offers a general applicability for high‐throughput assays as larvae can easily be treated and screened in the 96‐well format as it has been shown before for modulators of polycystic kidney disease using a morpholino‐based genetic zebrafish model 24 or a developmental drug nephrotoxicity assay 25 which both used pronephric morphometry as the primary readout.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these model organisms are not easily usable in high‐throughput assays and even in the era of CRISPR/Cas9 genetic manipulation is rather difficult and time‐consuming. In the zebrafish model, the small larval size and conserved morphology of the pronephros offers a general applicability for high‐throughput assays as larvae can easily be treated and screened in the 96‐well format as it has been shown before for modulators of polycystic kidney disease using a morpholino‐based genetic zebrafish model 24 or a developmental drug nephrotoxicity assay 25 which both used pronephric morphometry as the primary readout.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-class (dropdown) plugin (Figure 3) allows to choose keywords from several lists of choices using dropdown menus (Figure 3B). The labels and choices for the dropdown menus are defined by the user in a simple csv file (Extended data, Supplementary Figure 1) (Thomas, 2020). This is convenient if multiple image features should be reported in separate columns (content, quality, etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the annotation of ROIs, the presented plugins can be used in combination with our previously published ROI 1-click tools (Thomas & Gehrig, 2020), which facilitate the creation of ROIs of predefined shapes, and the automated execution of custom commands for these ROIs. The generated ROIs can then be described with qualitative features using the hereby presented plugins, either for one ROI at a time, or by simultaneously selecting multiple ROIs.…”
Section: Use Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables the automated acquisition of consistent views of 48–96 hpf zebrafish larvae in large-scale screening scenarios (Figure 2C ). For instance, we employed that methodology for imaging of embryonic kidneys in automated large-scale microscopy assays to score for morphological alterations of the pronephros upon compound exposure ( 93 , 125 , 128 ) (Westhoff et al unpublished data) or capture phenotypic changes in cystic kidney disease models ( 129 ) (Pandey et al, unpublished data). Other more complex technical solutions employ microfluidic systems that combine automated detection and rotational orientation within glass capillaries followed by microscopic imaging ( 127 , 130 ).…”
Section: Chemical Screening In Zebrafish—technical Aspects and Considmentioning
confidence: 99%