2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1330-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Mechanical Characterization of the Distraction Callus During Bone Consolidation

Abstract: Understanding the evolution of callus mechanical properties over time provides insights in the mechanobiology of fracture healing and tissue differentiation, can be used to validate numerical models, and informs clinical practice. Bone transport experiments were performed in sheep, in which a distractor type Ilizarov was implanted. The forces through the fixator evolution were measured and the callus stiffness was estimated from these forces. Computerized tomography images were taken and bone volume of the cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Figure A shows that the stiffness of the callus at 137, 205, and 311 days from surgery (time points from the same animal) is approximately three times the callus stiffness at 277, 379, and 471 days from surgery (time points from a different animal). This finding is due to the difference in volume of the callus of both animals that can be observed in 3D reconstructions (Figure ) . Figure also shows that inter‐individual differences are mainly due to callus geometry differences since the level of scatter is lower in the evolution of the mean elastic modulus compared with the callus stiffness, which depends on geometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Figure A shows that the stiffness of the callus at 137, 205, and 311 days from surgery (time points from the same animal) is approximately three times the callus stiffness at 277, 379, and 471 days from surgery (time points from a different animal). This finding is due to the difference in volume of the callus of both animals that can be observed in 3D reconstructions (Figure ) . Figure also shows that inter‐individual differences are mainly due to callus geometry differences since the level of scatter is lower in the evolution of the mean elastic modulus compared with the callus stiffness, which depends on geometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A, Predicted callus stiffness until 80 days after surgery for the methods used (mechanical properties assignment according to simple manual segmentation (MA), manual segmentation‐based experiments (MAE), and according to the level of Hounsfield units (HU) versus the measured callus stiffness in vivo (Mora‐Macías et al). The line represents the ideal position of the points represented if the predictions of the callus stiffness for each time point would coincide with the value of the callus stiffness measured in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations