2004
DOI: 10.1517/eobt.4.2.145.26331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo monitoring of cellular transplants by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tracing the movement of cells repeatedly in living subjects will allow the non-invasive monitoring of cellbased therapy in clinical settings (27). The Gd-based bimodal contrast agent GRID allows the visualization of NSCs in vivo using MRI and in vitro using fluorescence microscopy (3,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracing the movement of cells repeatedly in living subjects will allow the non-invasive monitoring of cellbased therapy in clinical settings (27). The Gd-based bimodal contrast agent GRID allows the visualization of NSCs in vivo using MRI and in vitro using fluorescence microscopy (3,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite contrary evidence from preclinical studies, there is some concern that transplantation of stem cells could further exacerbate tumor formation as there is mounting evidence that brain tumors are potentially caused by a single stem cell that did not differentiate [114]. The ability to monitor cell therapy in vivo is therefore desirable to potentially provide more control over the activity of stem cells [115]. One possibility is that stem cells will be engineered with a suicide gene [116] that could be activated if transplanted cells would not behave in a therapeutic manner.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Cell Therapy For Brain Tumors By Positron Emismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have demonstrated that iron-labeled NSCs can be tracked using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1315 but did not use MR evaluation for long periods of time (> 6 mo) and did not correlate NSC behavior with the dynamics of underlying pathology – critical for the actual translation of NSC-based therapeutics to patients7, 11, 16, 17. The ability to monitor NSCs for extended periods is particularly important in newborns because long-term implantation may pose unanticipated risks to the developing brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%