2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo study of the effects of exogenous hydrogen sulfide on lung mitochondria in acute lung injury in rats

Abstract: BackgroundAcute lung injury (ALI) is a serious disease with high incidence in ICU, and impaired mitochondria function plays a significant role in ALI. In this study, we examined the possible roles of exogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in lung mitochondria regulation in ALI rats.MethodsThe rat ALI model was induced by an intra-tongue vein Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. We used sodium hydrosulphide (NaHS) as the H2S donor. We randomly divided 40 Sprague–Dawley rats into five groups: control, LPS injury, LPS +… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten high-power fields were randomly selected from the anterior, median, and posterior regions of the lung section and scored according to the system of Smith et al, 11 which was semiquantitative and designed to compare various tissue damage microscopically. 12,13 According to this system, an independent pathologist assessed alveolar and interstitial inflammation, alveolar and interstitial hemorrhage, lung edema, atelectasis, necrosis, and the degree of hyaline membrane formation and assigned a score of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for each parameter, corresponding to no, mild, moderate, or severe changes, respectively. The mean score of 10 highpower fields for each region was calculated.…”
Section: Lung Injury Stress Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten high-power fields were randomly selected from the anterior, median, and posterior regions of the lung section and scored according to the system of Smith et al, 11 which was semiquantitative and designed to compare various tissue damage microscopically. 12,13 According to this system, an independent pathologist assessed alveolar and interstitial inflammation, alveolar and interstitial hemorrhage, lung edema, atelectasis, necrosis, and the degree of hyaline membrane formation and assigned a score of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for each parameter, corresponding to no, mild, moderate, or severe changes, respectively. The mean score of 10 highpower fields for each region was calculated.…”
Section: Lung Injury Stress Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial dysfunction is closely associated with lung injury [15, 16]. Regulation of mitochondrial dysfunction attenuates lung tissue damage [13, 14]. In the present study, we analyzed microglia polarization using mtDNA copy number, ATP synthases, and the release of cytosolic Cyt C based on a previous study [12, 33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to increased ROS production, mitochondrial DNA damage (copy number reduction and mutation), and disorders of oxidative phosphorylation of the mitochondrial respiratory chain [12, 13]. Previous reports have shown mitochondrial dysfunction, which is important for energy metabolism, inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, plays a substantial role in lung injury [14, 15]. Moreover, mitochondrial DNA provokes systemic inflammation in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung injury in rats [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in various other animal models, sulfide has been demonstrated to contribute to the development and progression of lung inflammation and injury [161]. Bizarrely and to the contrary, however, sulfide is apparently ameliorative in the case of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung-injury (ALI) in rats [162] and in burn/smoke-induced ALI in sheep[8]. Both Olson [130, 131] and Haouzi [163] have written extensively about the practicalities of manipulating sulfide in biological samples and the difficulty in distinguishing physiological from pharmacological processes, particularly at the uncertain sulfide levels obtained in tissues irrespective of the method of administration.…”
Section: Conflicting Observations Regarding the Chemical Toxicologmentioning
confidence: 99%