2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-3100-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Water Instrumentation and Platforms for Ocean Color Remote Sensing Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches for resolving size distributions are available, although none provide any systematic information on particle composition except scanning electron microscopy coupled with an energy dispersive spectrometer [ Peng et al , 2002, 2007; Groundwater et al , 2012]. All of these techniques require discrete sample collection and suffer associated limitations [ Gardner et al , 1993; Twardowski et al , 2005] except for in situ adaptations of laser diffractometry [ Agrawal and Pottsmith , 2000]. For in situ sampling of bubble size distributions only, the acoustical resonator [ Farmer et al , 1998; Czerski et al , 2011b] and videography [ Deane and Stokes , 1999] have been the most popular approaches, although lower size limits are several and 80 μ m, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches for resolving size distributions are available, although none provide any systematic information on particle composition except scanning electron microscopy coupled with an energy dispersive spectrometer [ Peng et al , 2002, 2007; Groundwater et al , 2012]. All of these techniques require discrete sample collection and suffer associated limitations [ Gardner et al , 1993; Twardowski et al , 2005] except for in situ adaptations of laser diffractometry [ Agrawal and Pottsmith , 2000]. For in situ sampling of bubble size distributions only, the acoustical resonator [ Farmer et al , 1998; Czerski et al , 2011b] and videography [ Deane and Stokes , 1999] have been the most popular approaches, although lower size limits are several and 80 μ m, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDOM is highly correlated with DOC in arctic rivers and streams [Spencer et al, 2009;Stedmon et al, 2011], allowing for remote sensing to indirectly measure DOC from satellite imagery. Indeed, remote sensing is regularly used in coastal and lake studies to map CDOM [Twardowski et al, 2005;Olmanson et al, 2008]. The spectral properties of a water body are influenced by CDOM, chlorophyll, particulates and detritus, and the water itself, such that field sampling is necessary to create region-specific empirically based algorithms to estimate CDOM [Coble, 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherent optical properties (IOPs), which control the propagation of light in water are strongly influenced by the composition of local particulate matter (Bohren and Huffman ; Jonasz and Fournier ). Both active and passive remote sensing rely on interpreting the signature of backscattered light from the ocean to detect algal biomass, “thin layers” with high phytoplankton concentration, suspended particle mass, and to quantify biological primary productivity (Platt and Satyendranath ; Stramski and Kiefer ; Twardowski et al ; Churnside et al ). Thus, characterizing oceanic particulates based on type, size, and shape has been the focus of a multitude of studies over the past several decades (Jackson et al ; Boss et al ; Twardowski et al ; Groundwater et al ; Twardowski et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%