1973
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.47.2.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inability of the Submaximal Treadmill Stress Test to Predict the Location of Coronary Disease

Abstract: SUMMARYTwo hundred patients had submaximal treadmill stress tests (STSTs) and selective coronary arteriography performed within 2 months of each other. An attempt was made to assess the predictability of disease isolated to any given coronary vessel by performance on the treadmill. This was not possible for disease isolated to the right coronary, the left anterior descending, the circumflex branch of the left coronary, or a combination of right coronary and circumflex arteries. Eleven patients had disease in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The same problems are encountered in stress electrocardiography (Kaplan et a/., 1973;Robertson et al, 1976). However, there was at least a trend noticeable in patients with a single stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery or the right coronary artery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The same problems are encountered in stress electrocardiography (Kaplan et a/., 1973;Robertson et al, 1976). However, there was at least a trend noticeable in patients with a single stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery or the right coronary artery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A incidência de doença triarterial ou de tronco da coronária esquerda nesses estudos, quando a depressão de ST foi >2 ou 3mm alcançou 57%-75% 52,55 . Os resultados de nosso estudo sugerem que, embora a quantidade de depressão de ST e tempo de recuperação podem ter bom valor preditivo para presença de IMS e DAC em hipertensos, não devem ser considerados como fortes preditores para a severidade da DAC obstrutiva quando comparados com estudos de angiografia coronária [28][29][30]40,43 . Outros índices, como carga de trabalho alcançada, tolerância ao esforço, angina intra-esforço, dispnéia excessiva, comportamento da PA intra e pós-esforço e duplo produto são também de grande valor em avaliar a reserva coronária regional e global 39,[44][45][46][47] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Assim, este estudo confirma o alto valor preditivo do TE relativo a IMS 36,52,55,57 . A positividade do exame em estudos comparativos com angiografia coronária nem sempre mantém relação com DAC obstrutiva 22,25,29,50 . Em pessoas hipertensas, esta não concordância da positividade do ECG de esforço, ausência de obstrução coronária à angiografia não deveria defini-lo como falso positivo, mas em grande percentagem dos casos, indício de déficit perfusional por doença arteriolar hipertensiva 36,52,53 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Newer insights about exercise testing Appropriate separation of uses: diagnosis, function, prognosis Objective confirmation of symptoms Repeatable assessment of therapy effect High yield around target heart rate Linear relation of work load and oxygen requirement Limitations for coronary anatomy diagnosis Probabilistic vs. all-or-none interpretation Relation of STD contour to severity and prognosis Relation of STD work load to severity and prognosis Relation of STD amplitude to severity Relation of STD duration to severity Significance of concordant STD during exercise and recovery Diagnostic use of discrepant pain, work load and STD Contribution of old Ml to false-negatives Prognostic importance STD in post-MI and well groups Equivalent importance of ST elevation Importance of multiple leads to detect Significance of fall in heart rate or pressure Prognostic importance of work capacity and heart rate x pressure Absence of a valid independent diagnostic reference significantly involved on angiography. A very clear tendency is seen for the test to be less than 50% sensitive for 1-vessel disease and generally 90% or better in sensitivity for 3-vessel disease [8,10,13,15].…”
Section: Severity Of Coronary Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%