2006
DOI: 10.1157/13089667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivación de micobacterias con desinfectantes registrados como tuberculicidas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, we have confirmed that M. abscessus and M. chelonae are significantly more resistant to QACs than M. smegmatis 29, 30. Although the activities of different QACs vary somewhat depending upon the mycobacterial species, DBLAB was the least effective of those tested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Further, we have confirmed that M. abscessus and M. chelonae are significantly more resistant to QACs than M. smegmatis 29, 30. Although the activities of different QACs vary somewhat depending upon the mycobacterial species, DBLAB was the least effective of those tested.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…QACs are described in the literature as only mycobacteriostatic, so we were surprised to find that a 20 min exposure to QACs appeared to be cidal against M. smegmatis , with at least 5 logs of killing; 14 although their effectiveness would likely be less if assayed in a carrier test in the presence of organic material. 15 Against M. fortuitum , M. chelonae , M. massiliense and M. abscessus , however, even with the simple suspension test employed here, we found that QACs kill only ∼90%–95% of bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Cidex and Cidex OPA were effective against tested organisms, showing greater than a 5-log reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) after 5 min of exposure under both clean and dirty conditions [13]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%