1967
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(67)90001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation and mutagenesis on isolated DNA. I. Theory of inactivation of transforming DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3a. This result probably is anomalous, however, because two more samples with very similar initial size did not give a similar result (see Table 1, lines [1][2][3]. The mean ratio of final to initial strand sizes for the second through the seventh entries in Table 1 is 0.494.…”
Section: Conditions Of Uptake Integration Of Donormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3a. This result probably is anomalous, however, because two more samples with very similar initial size did not give a similar result (see Table 1, lines [1][2][3]. The mean ratio of final to initial strand sizes for the second through the seventh entries in Table 1 is 0.494.…”
Section: Conditions Of Uptake Integration Of Donormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With reference to the dose reduction principle (Harm et al, 1971), [S,]/[S,] can be determined by the H. influenzae transformation assay. From experimental data (Rupert and Goodgal, 1960) and theoretical considerations (Bresler et al, 1964(Bresler et al, , 1967Rupert, 1968) it appeared that the UV inactivation curve of transforming DNA is inverse quadratic, obeying the expression:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bresler et al (7), transforming DNA is inactivated when the integrated segment of donor DNA bearing the marker selected for also contains an inactivating hit. The average number of hits (Z) per genetic target can be calculated from the transformation data: Z = 2(VS<7g -1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific transforming activity of markers was calculated by normalization to DNA concentration, determined by the concentration of 3H-thymine in DNA samples. The number of inactivating hits was calculated with the formula of Bresler et al (7), in which the average number of hits per genetic target (Z) is given by Z = 2(V977 -1), where SO is the specific transforming activity of a marker in unirradiated DNA and S is the specific transforming activity of that marker in the treated sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%