2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of Campylobacter during immersion chilling of chicken carcasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, carcass chilling is considered a critical step to avoid the cross‐contamination of pathogens. Commercial immersion chilling showed a potential cross‐contamination risk (Sukted et al, 2017). On the other hand using chlorine with the presence of high organic materials during the processing often reduces its antimicrobial efficacy (Paul et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, carcass chilling is considered a critical step to avoid the cross‐contamination of pathogens. Commercial immersion chilling showed a potential cross‐contamination risk (Sukted et al, 2017). On the other hand using chlorine with the presence of high organic materials during the processing often reduces its antimicrobial efficacy (Paul et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, carcass chilling is considered a critical step to avoid the cross-contamination of pathogens. Commercial immersion chilling showed a potential cross-contamination risk (Sukted et al, 2017).…”
Section: Ta B L E 3 Salmonella Serotypes Diversity Isolated Along The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scalder uses ∼1 L of water per bird (Barbut, 2016) and has been noted as a potential source of cross-contamination and investigated in Rothrock et al (2016a). After a chlorine or peracetic acid (PAA) wash, undesired body parts and internal organs are removed (Sukted et al, 2017;Blevins et al, 2018). The careful removal of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) during evisceration is important as rupturing of the organs, such as the ceca or crop, can introduce bacteria and potential pathogens to the product.…”
Section: Poultry Processing Systems and Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the regulatory framework for Campylobacter in food products, especially those of animal origin, the regulations of the U.S., EU, and Australia/New Zealand seem to be the most advanced worldwide. The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the USDA, for example, determines that the maximum acceptable percentage of positive samples can be 15.7% for chicken broiler carcasses, 5.4% for turkey carcasses, 7.7% for chicken parts, and 1.9% for comminuted chicken and comminuted turkey [ 11 ]. On the other hand, the EU has a risk assessment framework and a risk assessment model for Campylobacter in broilers that sets a maximum of 1000 cfu/g in 50 carcass samples after chilling [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%