2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.182257399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of CMP- N -acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase occurred prior to brain expansion during human evolution

Abstract: Humans are genetically deficient in the common mammalian sialic acid N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) because of an Alu-mediated inactivating mutation of the gene encoding the enzyme CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-Neu5Ac) hydroxylase (CMAH). This mutation occurred after our last common ancestor with bonobos and chimpanzees, and before the origin of present-day humans. Here, we take multiple approaches to estimate the timing of this mutation in relationship to human evolutionary history. First, we have deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
236
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
236
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evolutionary change occurred in the human lineage after our last common ancestor with the chimpanzee and bonobo (10,11), allowing recognition of N-acetylneuraminic acid, which, being a precursor to Neu5Gc accumulates at higher levels in humans (12). These data favor the hypothesis that CD33rSiglecs function primarily as self-recognition receptors for endogenous Sia ligands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This evolutionary change occurred in the human lineage after our last common ancestor with the chimpanzee and bonobo (10,11), allowing recognition of N-acetylneuraminic acid, which, being a precursor to Neu5Gc accumulates at higher levels in humans (12). These data favor the hypothesis that CD33rSiglecs function primarily as self-recognition receptors for endogenous Sia ligands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…If we could determine the oldest expansion event through genomic comparison, we might be able to identify whether such an Alu burst was the driving force for speciation between the two species from the common ancestor. Amplification of Alu elements during the evolution of primates and alteration of gene functions through the insertion of repetitive elements has been discussed in many previous studies [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] . However, further wide-ranging analyses comparing the chimpanzee and other primate genomes is necessary to clarify these points.…”
Section: Lineage-specific Insertions and Deletionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a number of TE-related rearrangement events have resulted in key innovations during evolution (e.g. [1,2]), it is nevertheless the case that these events are more frequently neutral or deleterious in terms of organismal fitness. The negative consequences of instability are perhaps best illustrated by the 25 distinct human genetic diseases that are attributable to TE-related rearrangements [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%