“… Microorganism (introduced dose in CFU/mL) | Experimental conditions (Utrasonication frequency and power density) and other hybrid systems | Media of sample and volume | Remarks | Ref. |
B.subtilis spores (10 6 ), Escherichia coli (250) | 20 KHz frequency, 38.5, 50, 285.7 W/cm 2 power intensity | 120 mL distilled water | B. subtilis was resistant, but E. coli was inactivated by 2.97 ± 0.58-logs in 5 min at 817 kHz | [167] |
Microcystis aeruginosa (1.3 × 10 6 ) | 20–1137 KHz frequency, 0.45 W/cm 3 power density | 300 mL sample | Higher ultrasonic frequencies (60 % inactive) more effective than lower frequencies (30 % inactive) | [168] |
Bacillus subtilis (10 4 ) | Dual-frequency (70 + 33 KHz and 70 + 100 KHz) and 0.025 W/cm 3 power densisty | 30 L/h flow-through pilot scale | It is efficient treatment with 70 + 100 KHz after pretreatment with NaOCl and 17 + 33 KHz | [169] |
Microcystis aeruginosa (10 6 ) | 120 KHz to 1120 KHz frequency with 0.01–0.09 power density | Ultrapure water sample | Cells are more inactivate at 430 and 740 KHz than other frequencies with 80–90 % turbidity removal | [170] |
Escherichia coli (1 × 10 9 ) | 2 MHz frequency | 0.1 mL of 3 % tryptic soy broth | 2-log disinfection is achieved within 10 min | [171] |
E. coli (10 5 ) | 20 KHz frequency with 11 W/cm 2 power intensity + 2.25 mW/cm 2 UV intensity | 70 mL/min flow through 0.9 % saline solution | A synergistic ehnacement is observed under utrasonication and UV light inactivation | [172] |
Fecal coliform bacteria (3.67 × 10 2 −9.48 × 10 4 ) | 28 KHz frequency + 254 nm UV light | 900–2100 L/h continuous flow baffled secondary effluents | A synergistic effect observed. 4.24 log reduction observed at specific energy, 0.219 kWh/m 3 and 1200 L/h | [173] |
E. coli (10 8 ) | 33 KHz frequency + 0.035 mW/cm 2 UV inten... |
…”