1974
DOI: 10.1016/0048-4059(74)90002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of pectic enzymes by polyphenols in cotton seedlings of different ages infected with Rhizoctonia solani

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that (+ )-catechin is the main tannin precursor in cottonseed, as in other cotton tissues (Hunter, 1974;Mace and Howell, 1974;Howell, et al, 1976). Large amounts of DMB-reactive material remained at the origin of the chromatograms, and were probably oligomeric condensed tannins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that (+ )-catechin is the main tannin precursor in cottonseed, as in other cotton tissues (Hunter, 1974;Mace and Howell, 1974;Howell, et al, 1976). Large amounts of DMB-reactive material remained at the origin of the chromatograms, and were probably oligomeric condensed tannins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Inhibition of fungi by (-f)-catechin from cotton tissues has been demonstrated (Hunter, 1974;Howell et al, 1976). Non-ripened seed coats are rich in (+ )-catechin and non-oxidized condensed tannins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the fungus may express only a limited level of cell wall-hydrolytic enzymes as an adaptation to the symbiotic life, in which the symbiont must avoid eliciting host resistance reactions (Ramstedt and Soderhall, 1983). Second, these low enzyme activities may be locally modulated by phenolics (Hunter, 1974;Scalbert, 1991 nerini, 1992). In addition, fungal growth itself could be potentially inhibited by the products of an induced oxidative cleavage of catechin and its derivatives, as discussed in defense mechanisms of the tea plant against fungal pathogens (Chakraborty et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the ectomycorrhizal fungi should only express a limited level of cell walldegrading enzymes as an adaptation to their mutualistic life (Ramstedt and SoÈ derhaÈ ll 1983), being per se unable to allow intracellular hyphal growth. These low enzyme activities might easily be modulated by phenylpropanoids (Hunter 1974;Scalbert 1991) to control the intercellular invasion of the fungus. This is in line with a study on nitrogen release from protein-polyphenol complexes (Bending and Read 1996a) showing that in contrast to extracellular proteases from saprophytic wood-degrading fungi, those from the majority of ectomycorrhizal fungi tested, were unable to mobilise these complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%