2013
DOI: 10.1556/eujmi.3.2013.3.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of rickettsiae

Abstract: A reliable and complete inactivation is an indispensable premise for any concentration of rickettsiae or for the development of diagnostic strategies based on their antigens. This study deals with the testing of methods to inactivate rickettsiae.Rickettsia honei was used as a model organism. The inactivating potency of formalin, Qiagen ® antiviral lysozyme (AVL) buffer, heating to 56 °C, and β-propiolactone was analyzed in cell culture.The inactivation limits for rickettsiae were 0.1% formalin about 10 min, Qi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To effectively kill anthrax spores, a solution of either 5% formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde, a 1:10 dilution of home bleach adjusted to a pH of 7, or a 500 mg/L chlorine dioxide aqueous solution is used. As was recently established for rickettsiae, testing for dependable inactivation should include titration of the least harsh, yet safely inactivating technique and the assessment of time-inactivation curves (Frickmann and Dobler 2013). Diagnostic methods that come after inactivation techniques that are too harsh might be compromised.…”
Section: Challenges In Diagnosis and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively kill anthrax spores, a solution of either 5% formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde, a 1:10 dilution of home bleach adjusted to a pH of 7, or a 500 mg/L chlorine dioxide aqueous solution is used. As was recently established for rickettsiae, testing for dependable inactivation should include titration of the least harsh, yet safely inactivating technique and the assessment of time-inactivation curves (Frickmann and Dobler 2013). Diagnostic methods that come after inactivation techniques that are too harsh might be compromised.…”
Section: Challenges In Diagnosis and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology used should be based on the lab's capabilities and include an in‐house verification of the method. Inactivation methods reported as effective include formalin‐inactivation, acetone fixation, and gamma‐cell irradiation (Eisenberg & Osterman, 1979 ; Frickmann & Dobler, 2013 ; McDade, Black, Roumillat, Redus, & Spruill, 1988 ). Acetone fixation as an inactivation step may be preferable as it is already part of the IFA workflow.…”
Section: Monitoring Guinea Pig Immune Response To Rickettsial Infecti...mentioning
confidence: 99%