2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological laboratory diagnostics of neglected zoonotic diseases (NZDs)

Abstract: This review reports on laboratory diagnostic approaches for selected, highly pathogenic neglected zoonotic diseases, i.e. anthrax, bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, echinococcosis, leishmaniasis, rabies, Taenia solium-associated diseases (neuro-/cysticercosis & taeniasis) and trypanosomiasis. Diagnostic options, including microscopy, culture, matrix-assisted laser-desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry, molecular approaches and serology are introduced. These procedures are critically discussed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 320 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…that infect livestock due to the very low infectious dose [19–20]. In many low-income countries, there are few or no bio-safety level 3 laboratories available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that infect livestock due to the very low infectious dose [19–20]. In many low-income countries, there are few or no bio-safety level 3 laboratories available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the relevance of species identification in clinical and epidemiological terms, this is not carried out routinely in most clinical centers and is generally limited to research laboratories 13,14 . Based on existing information, some countries have attempted to describe the circulating species in their territories 11,[15][16][17] , without reaching the micro-geographical scale.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical manifestations are often varied and symptoms can be subclinical, whereas culture methods are time-consuming and often produce no yield. 7,8 All of these factors contribute to the low sensitivity associated with these methods. 9 On the other hand, molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are used primarily in research and approach 99-100% in both sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%