Formation of the transcription-competent open promoter complex (RP o ) by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) 3 is a critical checkpoint on the pathway of gene expression. In bacteria, the transition from initial recognition of the promoter by RNAP to RP o proceeds through a series of short-lived intermediate complexes (1-3). In RP o , the DNA duplex is disrupted over a stretch of 12-15 base pairs, which leads to the formation of the transcription bubble and makes the transcription start point (position ϩ1) accessible to the RNAP catalytic center (4, 5). An important source of energy driving this strand separation process is the interaction of the RNAP 70 subunit region 2 with the non-template strand of the Ϫ10 promoter element at the upstream edge of the transcription bubble (6 -9). The interaction with the Ϫ10 element adenine at position Ϫ11 of the nontemplate strand is of special importance for nucleation of promoter melting (6, 10). RNAP interaction with the template segment of the transcription bubble was estimated to be considerably weaker than that with the non-template segment (8). Although formation of intermediates on the pathway to RP o has been characterized kinetically in many studies (1-3, 11, 12), it is still unclear which energetically favorable RNAP-promoter interactions are coupled with downstream propagation of the transcription bubble and determine its final boundary position at ϩ2/ϩ3.The crystal structures of prokaryotic RNAP indicate that establishment of RNAP interactions with the downstream duplex upon RP o formation must introduce a sharp kink in DNA, which may facilitate melting and stabilize the open complex (13,14). Indeed, RNAP mutations that change RNAP contacts with downstream DNA reduce the longevity of open complexes formed at certain promoters (15, 16). On highly supercoiled DNA, the downstream interactions may not be obligatory, as an RNAP subassembly containing an N-terminal fragment of the Escherichia coli RNAP Ј subunit (lacking Ј amino acids involved in contacts with downstream DNA) and a fragment of 70 subunit was reported to recognize and melt an extended Ϫ10 consensus promoter (17). However, melting observed in these experiments might not necessarily mirror steps in RP o formation by RNAP (3, 18). Downstream RNAPpromoter contacts are targeted by low molecular weight inhibitors and protein repressors that affect transcription initiation (16, 19 -21).Unraveling the role of downstream RNAP-promoter interactions in open complex formation and regulation of transcription initiation is hindered by the lack of experimental tools to directly measure their strength and specificity. Upon formation of the open promoter complex, two DNA fork junction structures are created around positions Ϫ12 and ϩ2. Studies of RNAP interactions with model DNA fragments mimicking the upstream fork junction provided important structural (22) and functional insights into the processes of promoter recognition and melting (8,9,(23)(24)(25)(26). Here, we introduce downstream fork junction fragments as ...