2020
DOI: 10.4000/lhomme.37622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactualités de la révolution néolithique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergence of sedentism during the Neolithic lends itself particularly well to such questions, for it crystallizes both ends of the issue. When we see the Neolithic as a great revolution in the history of humankind, it becomes the natural receptacle of our totalizing misconceptions (Finlayson and Warren 2010;Hadad 2020); we are legitimizing them by reenforcing their pretension to universality. But at the same time, the archaeology of the Neolithic now provides us with an opportunity to understand, empirically, how humans constitute new territories in the long run.…”
Section: Beneath Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of sedentism during the Neolithic lends itself particularly well to such questions, for it crystallizes both ends of the issue. When we see the Neolithic as a great revolution in the history of humankind, it becomes the natural receptacle of our totalizing misconceptions (Finlayson and Warren 2010;Hadad 2020); we are legitimizing them by reenforcing their pretension to universality. But at the same time, the archaeology of the Neolithic now provides us with an opportunity to understand, empirically, how humans constitute new territories in the long run.…”
Section: Beneath Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, and this is perhaps the point that sheds the brightest light on the difficulties to which the criterion proposed by A. Testart leads, some societies, in one way or another, challenge his classification. Apart from various Siberian cases, whose interpretation and scope have recently fuelled an abundant debate (Stépanoff 2018;Guy 2020;Hadad 2020;Darmangeat 2018a;2020b), the most striking example is probably that of the Tareumiut, the Inuit of northern Alaska. Among this people, rich individuals, the umialit, were dominant in social life.…”
Section: …And Its Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any society in which there are dominations stemming from wealth is certainly a wealth society -but this assertion is obviously nothing more than a tautology. The problem is that, in the opposite direction, we can observe societies where certain social occasions give rise to payments in goods, but which have multiplied the mechanisms preventing these customs from provoking a differentiation between individuals and the emergence, on this basis, of relations of domination and power: one can think, in particular, of the Pueblo Indians and, perhaps, of those of the eastern coast of North America to which Rémi Hadad refers (Hadad 2020). Finally, I ended up with a symmetrical error to that of A. Testart: where his definition excludes from the world of wealth those societies without bride price and wergild, but where socio-economic inequalities prevail, mine excluded those that had bride price and wergild, while remaining devoid of significant socio-economic inequalities.…”
Section: …And Its Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research carried out by anthropologists (Hadad, 2020) invites us to consider the earliest origins of addictive behaviour. Across the world, we can find evidence of alcohol consumption, even in the very distant past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%