Inappropriate ambulance usage is a retrospective diagnosis.

Wilson, Sue; Edwards, S; Cooke, Matthew

doi:10.1136/emj.16.1.75

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another factor affecting the retrospective method of determining urgency is that if the patient is transported to hospital by ambulance, the treatment provided by paramedics may have improved the patient's condition before arrival at the ED, and therefore these cases will be at a lower triage level on arrival than they were at the time of symptom presentation. 22 Similarly, the evaluation of patient adherence to telephone triage recommendations in Western Australia 23 identified that adherence is dependent on symptom presentation.…”

Section: Retrospective V Prospective Case Definition and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Judging a patient's decision to seek emergency healthcare: clues for managing increasing patient demand

Morgans

Burgess

2012

Aust. Health Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. In recent years, the concept of an ‘inappropriate’ emergency department or ambulance user has arisen. This discussion paper explores definition and measurement of inappropriate emergency healthcare utilisation, and the effect on demand. Method. A comprehensive literature review of published articles was conducted. Results. Exploration of the definitions of ‘inappropriate’ emergency healthcare utilisation identified two patient cohorts; emergency healthcare utilisation by those who are not experiencing a health emergency, and those who do not seek emergency healthcare who should. Several position papers from Australian and international sources emphasised the patient’s right to access emergency healthcare when they feel the need, and the responsibility of emergency healthcare workers to provide treatment to all patients. Differences between medical classifications of urgency based on physiological measures are contrasted with patient-based determination of urgency, which is defined by psychosocial factors. Conclusions. This literature review raises questions about patients’ understanding of the role of emergency healthcare services in an emergency. This has implications for determining the patient’s point of access to the health system in an acute health event, and offers an opportunity to selectively educate patients and carers to change help-seeking behaviours to suit the health system resources and moderate patient demand. What is known about the topic? There is a public health issue where some patients seek emergency healthcare when they are not acutely unwell (inappropriate health service users) and some patients who fail to seek emergency healthcare when they are acutely unwell (patients who ‘delay’ or avoid using emergency health services). There is a difference in understanding between health professionals and patients about what a health emergency is and when it is appropriate to seek emergency healthcare. There is an increasing demand for emergency health services both nationally and internationally. What does this paper add? This paper provides a review of Australian and international rates of ‘inappropriate’ healthcare utilisation. This paper identifies the limitations on the ability to determine whether patients were appropriate or inappropriate, and instead identifies what motivates patients to seek emergency healthcare for non-acute events and fail to seek healthcare for acute events. What are the implications for practitioners? There is a high demand for health services, which is increasing, and understanding patient motivations to seek healthcare may assist the development of demand management strategies. This paper will enhance practitioner understanding of patient motivation to seek emergency healthcare. This paper concludes with educational information that practitioners can use to change patient healthcare utilisation patterns.

show abstract

Section: Retrospective V Prospective Case Definition and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Judging a patient's decision to seek emergency healthcare: clues for managing increasing patient demand

Morgans

Burgess

2012

Aust. Health Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Path Analysis Modeling Indicates Free Transport Increases Ambulance Use for Minor Indications

Ting¹,

Chang²

2006

Prehospital Emergency Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ambulance use increased in 2004 after patient transport fees were abolished. Increased use was associated with decreased age, clinical acuity, and admission need. Abolishing direct patient cost stimulates ambulance use, potentially including inappropriate transport. Path analysis to assess the effect of changed funding on ambulance use could be used to the influence of other locally relevant factors contributing to ambulance use.

show abstract

Patients who call emergency ambulances for primary care problems: a qualitative study of the decision-making process

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many calls are based on fundamental misconceptions about the types of treatment other urgent-care avenues can provide, which may be amenable to educational intervention. This is particularly relevant for patients with chronic conditions with frequent exacerbations. Callers who have care responsibilities often default to the most immediate response available, with decision making driven by a lower tolerance of perceived risk. There may be a greater role for more detailed triage in these cases, and closer working between ambulance responses and urgent primary care, as a perceived or actual distance between these two service sectors may be influencing patient decision making on urgent care.

show abstract

Inappropriate ambulance usage is a retrospective diagnosis.

Abstract: Letters, CD-ROM review 75 better if we are to proactively manage this demand to the benefit of the patient, the ambulance service, and the wider NHS.

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Judging a patient's decision to seek emergency healthcare: clues for managing increasing patient demand

Judging a patient's decision to seek emergency healthcare: clues for managing increasing patient demand

Path Analysis Modeling Indicates Free Transport Increases Ambulance Use for Minor Indications

Patients who call emergency ambulances for primary care problems: a qualitative study of the decision-making process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About