2016 21st Conference on Electrical Power Distribution Networks Conference (EPDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/epdc.2016.7514800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentive cloud-based demand response program using game theory in smart grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incentives might be separated from, or additional to, their retail electricity rate, which may be fixed (based on average costs) or time-varying. Load reductions are needed and requested either when the system reliability conditions are treated or when prices are too high [27].…”
Section: B Drm Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incentives might be separated from, or additional to, their retail electricity rate, which may be fixed (based on average costs) or time-varying. Load reductions are needed and requested either when the system reliability conditions are treated or when prices are too high [27].…”
Section: B Drm Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above aggregator business scheme, contract theory (CT) [21], [22] is carried out using novelty formulas to estimate interruptible power with rewards. The process considers the users' demands, electricity purchased cost, DG available capacity, and risk evaluation (uncertain renewable energy [15]) to determine the appropriate interruptible power along with the price or incentive payment [11], [23], leading to both electricity industry and user groups can get profits and rewards. Each demand aggregator can cooperate with multiple generation aggregators and use the dynamic game model (DGM) [14], [24]- [28] to evenly distribute the DG resources, such as renewable energy capacity, AC power generation capacity, and energy storage system capacity, all of which are based on user participation intention, interruptible power, user demand, and decentralized power supply risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, in the traditional ways of energy production and transaction, energy companies often execute lots of contracts and conduct extensive calculations, which demands high costs of transaction and risks management. The emerging blockchain technology with promising characteristics, such as decentralization, transparency, reliance and openness would contribute to alleviate aforementioned problem by distributed energy transaction [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%