2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20160797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and distribution of congenital malformations clinically detected at birth: a prospective study at tertiary care hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prevalence of congenital anomalies was 0.9% in this study. The worldwide rate of congenital malformations ranges between 2% -3% of all births, and differs between countries according to implementation of powerful routine ultrasound screening programs and detection rates of different anomalies [10]. Our results were a partly comparable with those of Taboo, et al who evaluated the predominance of congenital anomalies and the associated risk factors in Iraq.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Prevalence of congenital anomalies was 0.9% in this study. The worldwide rate of congenital malformations ranges between 2% -3% of all births, and differs between countries according to implementation of powerful routine ultrasound screening programs and detection rates of different anomalies [10]. Our results were a partly comparable with those of Taboo, et al who evaluated the predominance of congenital anomalies and the associated risk factors in Iraq.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…7,8 Vyas et.al from Kota and Gandhi et.al from Surat both have reported much lower incidence of congenital anomalies at birth i.e 1.23%. 9,10 In our study the maximum number of congenital anomalies was from the musculo skeletal system followed by the central nervous system. Tenali et.al and Bhat et.al have also reported musculoskeletal congenital anomalies as the commonest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%