2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and survival of remnant disks around main-sequence stars

Abstract: Abstract. We present photometric ISO 60 and 170 um measurements, complemented by some IRAS data at 60 µm, of a sample of 84 nearby main-sequence stars of spectral class A, F, G and K in order to determine the incidence of dust disks around such main-sequence stars. Fifty stars were detected at 60 µm; 36 of these emit a flux expected from their photosphere while 14 emit significantly more. The excess emission we attribute to a circumstellar disk like the ones around Vega and β Pictoris. Thirty four stars were n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
200
3
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
28
200
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these stable systems, our dust flux calculations yield typical values for the dust-tostellar-flux ratio F/F star of 0.1−0.5 at 25 μm and 10−35 at 70 μm after 1 Gyr of simulated dynamical and calculated collisional evolution. These values are broadly consistent with the fluxes detected around solar-type stars with observed excesses at 24 and 70 μm (Habing et al 2001;Beichman et al 2006;Moór et al 2006;Trilling et al 2008;Hillenbrand et al 2008;Carpenter et al 2009;Gáspár et al 2009), although our stable simulations yield very few systems with F/F star (70 μm) ≈ 1−10, probably because of the relatively large masses in our outer planetesimal disks (note that our unstable systems can yield those flux levels). Compared with the more sophisticated models of dust production during planetary accretion of Kenyon & Bromley (2008, our calculated fluxes are larger by a factor of a few, notably at 70 μm.…”
Section: Debris Disk Modelingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In these stable systems, our dust flux calculations yield typical values for the dust-tostellar-flux ratio F/F star of 0.1−0.5 at 25 μm and 10−35 at 70 μm after 1 Gyr of simulated dynamical and calculated collisional evolution. These values are broadly consistent with the fluxes detected around solar-type stars with observed excesses at 24 and 70 μm (Habing et al 2001;Beichman et al 2006;Moór et al 2006;Trilling et al 2008;Hillenbrand et al 2008;Carpenter et al 2009;Gáspár et al 2009), although our stable simulations yield very few systems with F/F star (70 μm) ≈ 1−10, probably because of the relatively large masses in our outer planetesimal disks (note that our unstable systems can yield those flux levels). Compared with the more sophisticated models of dust production during planetary accretion of Kenyon & Bromley (2008, our calculated fluxes are larger by a factor of a few, notably at 70 μm.…”
Section: Debris Disk Modelingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The last sample consists of the K and M dwarfs studied by Fleming et al (1995;D < 7 pc, agese1 Gyr) and all single F and G stars within 14 pc for which data are available in the BSC. 5 Aside from 1 UMa, which likely is a member of the Ursa Major moving group (age 300 Myr; e.g., Messina & Guinan 2002), the stars in the nearby F-G sample likely have ages of at least 2 Gyr (e.g., Habing et al 2001). In Table 1 and Figure 3 we display the mean HRs for the Taurus TTS, local association, Hyades, and field star samples; in calculating these means and their formal errors, we use as weights the inverse squared uncertainties in HR1 and HR2.…”
Section: Comparison With T Tauri Stars the Hyades And Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We model the spectral energy distribution (SED) of z Lep with a 1993 Kurucz stellar atmosphere, assuming solar metallicity ( ). We assume no interstellar extinction because [Z/H] p 0.0 (Moshir et al 1989) with green error bars, and from the Infrared Space Observatory (Habing et al 2001) with red error bars. Our 11.7 and 17.9 mm photometry, as reported here, is shown with magenta error bars.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%