2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12267-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of sight-threatening retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study: a cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
215
4
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
27
215
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Around 79% of individuals invited for diabetic eye screening in England took up the offer of screening in 2010/2011 [4]. Patients who do not attend for screening have poorer HbA 1c and blood pressure control [7] and have been diagnosed with diabetes for longer [7,8], all of which are risk factors for developing retinopathy [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These observations suggest that patients who do not attend for eye screening might be at increased risk of diabetic eye disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 79% of individuals invited for diabetic eye screening in England took up the offer of screening in 2010/2011 [4]. Patients who do not attend for screening have poorer HbA 1c and blood pressure control [7] and have been diagnosed with diabetes for longer [7,8], all of which are risk factors for developing retinopathy [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These observations suggest that patients who do not attend for eye screening might be at increased risk of diabetic eye disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,23 For the current study, we categorized DR severity as no DR (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study level 10-15), mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR; level 20), moderate NPDR (level [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], severe NPDR (level 53-60) and proliferative DR (PDR; level 61-80) using the eye with the most severe grading. The severity of DME was classified using the American Academy of Ophthalmology scale 25 as no, mild, moderate and severe DME.…”
Section: Assessment Of Dr and Dmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ophthalmologist examined patients for the presence of diabetic eye disease and graded according to criteria used in the Liverpool Diabetes Eye Study. 16 Slit lamp examination with 78 or 90 D was performed after pupil dilatation using tropicamide 1% ophthalmic solution or phenylephrine 10% eye drops. If treatable abnormalities were detected, patients were offered further intervention when possible.…”
Section: Setting Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (Qech) Inmentioning
confidence: 99%