Incident Management Approaches above the Incident Management Team Level in Australia

Abstract

This paper discusses incident management strategies widely used above the incident management team (IMT) level in the four Australian States namely, Victoria, New South Wales, Tasmania and Queensland. It begins with an overview of how incident management approaches above the IMT might differ from the local IMT level. By exploring this difference, this paper provides an insight into how emergency management personnel working above or beyond the local IMT level often deal with large scale multiple emergency events and require an understanding of broader problems that they might confront in the future. Then, it provides an outline of how strategic emergency management objectives are addressed in the state level arrangements in aforementioned jurisdictions. Specifically, this includes response orientations, state level emergency management facilities, long term thinking, the management of stakeholder relationships, leadership, and organisational adaptation and capacity building. Later, some of the challenges associated with incident management above the IMT level are discussed. Finally, the paper concludes by discussing the implications of this study to the emergency management sector.

‘Any prediction is better than none’? A study of the perceptions of fire behaviour analysis users in Australia

“…Established and new stakeholders within and outside incident response have increasingly come to rely upon these practitioners and their forecasts to respond to severe wildfire seasons, though the underlying modelling still contains 'significant knowledge gaps' (Pacheco et al 2015: 7;Plucinski et al 2017). Such changes in use may potentially be driven not only by the increasing frequency and severity of fire seasons (Abatzoglou et al 2019), and the increasing number of people living in wildland-urban interfaces (Mell et al 2010), but also by heightened expectations placed on fire and land management agencies (Bhandari et al 2015) and their forms of predictive analysis (Neale and May 2018).…”

Twenty Challenges in Incident Planning

“…Incident planning may be implemented by different groups at one or more administrative echelons, which may operate from different locations, depending on existing regulations, the structure of the emergency response system and incident needs (Haddow, Bullock, and Coppola 2008). For a simple incident, such as a small wildland fire or a hazardous materials spill, incident planning will likely be conducted by senior members of first responder agencies, such as fire, police and emergency medical service departments, operating in an Incident Command Post (ICP) (Bhandari, Owen, and Trist 2015). As the incident expands or if multiple incidents occur (for example in an earthquake or flood), local or regional multi-agency coordination groups will likely develop incident plans to provide direction to first responder agencies and support incident management (McEntire 2006).…”