2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01808-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental axillary dose delivery to axillary lymph node levels I–III by different techniques of whole-breast irradiation: a systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, we showed that the delivered dose to axillary levels I, II, and III varied significantly according to patient BMI and irradiation techniques. The values are consistent with several other previously published studies [15,16,20]. HT fields deliver a significantly higher mean dose at levels I, II, and III than the ST fields and IMRT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, we showed that the delivered dose to axillary levels I, II, and III varied significantly according to patient BMI and irradiation techniques. The values are consistent with several other previously published studies [15,16,20]. HT fields deliver a significantly higher mean dose at levels I, II, and III than the ST fields and IMRT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the case of whole breast or parietal irradiation, several studies have shown that a nonzero and heterogeneous dose, depending on the technique, was delivered unintentionally to the axillary area [15,16]. A study showed a trend between the irradiation technique and the risk of axillary recurrence (Schmitt et al, "A retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factor of axillary recurrence of breast cancer", preprint) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we found a lower risk of lymphedema in patients treated with IMRT. As regional nodal irradiation was not permitted and most patients received sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary staging, this difference may be explained by differences in the incidental exposure to the axilla [ 30 , 31 ]. Our findings related to the choice of radiotherapy technique should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and need to be analyzed in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review identified 13 retrospective studies with a total of 475 patients which analyzed dosimetric parameters of axillary lymph node levels for patients planned for adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy [ 22 ]. There was considerable variation in axillary doses depending on the use of high tangents and radiation technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was considerable variation in axillary doses depending on the use of high tangents and radiation technique. For patients treated with standard tangential 3DRT, median dose in axillary levels I-III ranged from 22 to 43.5 Gy, 3 to 35.6 Gy, and 1 to 20.5 Gy, respectively [ 22 ]. In addition to these retrospective studies, Hildebrandt et al recently published prospective data from the quality assurance program of the INSEMA-trial [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%