2008
DOI: 10.3406/rfeco.2008.1659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incitations et licenciement individuel

Abstract: Cet article présente une revue de la littérature consacrée à l'étude des effets de la protection de l'emploi, relative notamment au licenciement individuel, sur le comportement des agents économiques impliqués dans la relation de travail. Ces analyses montrent que les règles juridiques encadrant la rupture de cette relation ne sont pas neutres. En effet, elles influencent non seulement le comportement des protagonistes lors de cette éventuelle rupture (que ce soit dans le choix du mode de séparation ou dans la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second place, the Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) in Spain, as in the case of the minimum wage, exhibits no cross‐regional variation since there exists a single national regulation. Thus, in order to account for the effects of this institution, we draw on a growing literature studying the impact of judicial rulings over labor market variables and its relationship with firing costs (Gabuthy & Lambert, 2008; Goerke & Pannenberg, 2010; Jimeno et al., 2015; Martín‐Román et al., 2013). The underlying idea is that labor courts located in a specific region ruling systematically more likely in favor of employees increase firing costs for employers operating in that area.…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second place, the Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) in Spain, as in the case of the minimum wage, exhibits no cross‐regional variation since there exists a single national regulation. Thus, in order to account for the effects of this institution, we draw on a growing literature studying the impact of judicial rulings over labor market variables and its relationship with firing costs (Gabuthy & Lambert, 2008; Goerke & Pannenberg, 2010; Jimeno et al., 2015; Martín‐Román et al., 2013). The underlying idea is that labor courts located in a specific region ruling systematically more likely in favor of employees increase firing costs for employers operating in that area.…”
Section: Databasementioning
confidence: 99%