Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool

Abstract

Abstract:Characterizing consumers in terms of their propensity to practice sustainable consumption represents an interesting research challenge in which a crucial role is played by the questionnaire in terms of its structure and classification criteria. Various classification rules have been proposed in the literature, which can be used to identify consumer types and signify their propensity to practice the principles of sustainable development in daily life. In this paper, we based our approach in designing a classification tool on a combination of two elements: the concept of voluntary simplicity as a pillar for consumer characteristics and the idea of assessing consumers by using filters, in a modified form introducing many new aspects of life-cycle thinking. The tool proposed provides insight into the relationship between the consumer's typology and behavior during purchasing decisions in daily life. The main function of the proposed tool is to assign respondents to one of the proposed consumer types distinguished and characterized in terms of many aspects of life cycle thinking. A pilot survey has been performed in order to verify the proposed tool, and the survey results have been presented in the paper, as well.

Retailer–Consumer Sustainable Business Environment: How Consumers’ Perceived Benefits Are Translated by the Addition of New Retail Channels

“…Not only that, but the newly deployed strategies should result in increased consumer benefits [6]. This means simultaneously adding new channels to existing ones to remove initial uncertainties and barriers in the purchase process for consumers and getting a detailed comparison of the implications to adding either online or offline channels for retailers [7]. This strategy should allow retailers to get their products (any category) to consumers in the most convenient and cost-effective way [1].…”

Voluntary simplicity: A literature review and research agenda

“…, Chhetri, et al (2009a),Seegebarth et al (2016),Nepomuceno and Laroche (2015),Chieh-Wen et al (2008),Cowles and Crosby (1986),Boujbel and d'Astous (2012),Chhetri et al (2009b),Rich et al (2017), Peyer et al (2017), Shama (1988,Lewandowska et al (2018),Erdoǧmuş and Karapinar (2015),Pestle et al …”

Sustainable Development as a Factor Differentiating Consumer Behavior: The Case of Poland

“…Therefore, as Lewandowska et al (2018) noted "consumer power," if directed correctly, could be able to make a "construction" by insignificant increments and to constitute a basis for conditioning the imperative of sustainability in everyday life. In this context, a vital question is what "everyday sustainability" means.…”

“…In this context, a vital question is what "everyday sustainability" means. Sustainability itself is a complex and multicomponent concept founded on the assumption that meeting human needs and achieving economic development should be made by ensuring a balance between economic, social, and environmental systems (Lewandowska et al, 2018).…”