Inclusive development of social entrepreneurship in nature management

Abstract


 
 
 Social entrepreneurship development in Ukraine is a priority guideline based on the creation and improvement of government policy on ecosystem orientation and inclusion, which provides public access to tourism and natural resources. The main component of inclusive development of social entrepreneurship emphasizes the basic principles of its existence, such as the ability to achieve one’s own goals, despite the economic effect of one’s activities. In the quantitative comparative analysis and need to reach economic indicators, the main factors are determined by the idea of inclusive development in nature management, as a field of activity in which not only the state but also multidisciplinary international organizations invest. The aim of the article is to identify opportunities for inclusive nature management development in social entrepreneurship in Ukraine by summarizing the existing practice of using indices and identifying indicators that will correspond to inclusive nature management parameters. Determining the position and directions of social entrepreneurship development in Ukraine was determined using an index approach, which, in contrast to others, allows one to identify indicators that characterize the sphere of development on economic and environmental influence of the country on the basis of inclusivity. The analysis of international rating assessments and Ukraine’s place in them requires a rethinking of existing approaches to the search for economically feasible ways to improve socio-economic and environmental indicators and their rating positions. The method of multi-indicator immersion is used in the article to identify the main indicators of economic, inclusive growth and social components, which are due to the experience in nature management and characterize the development of social entrepreneurship. The calculations of the Inclusive Development Index of Social Entrepreneurship in Ukraine as a consolidated index according to the geometric formula, which comprised synthetic indicators of the human capital index to outline the inclusive range of components, brand index and index of environmental indicators, proved that today the ecological state of environment and health of the population have a significant negative impact on economic growth and welfare of the population.
 
 

A Complex Systems Approaches to Sustainable Waste Management: the Case of a Recreational and Tourist Region of Ukraine

“…Rationality is only about the system, not the environment. In this sense, with the help of a systematic approach, it is possible to theoretically substantiate the deep nature of environmental problems (Kostetska et al, 2021): the individual is isolated from the environment and the problems of its pollution (including directly through the fault of the individual), because it is a system that establishes links with the surrounding natural and other environment, based on their own interests, which, in the individual's opinion, will ensure stability and the pleasure of life. In this case, the system (individual or group of people) acts indifferently to the environment, because it acts rationally: environmental problems remain outside the system.…”

Greening Basis of the Socially Responsible Business

“…Analysis of recent publications of the problem. In the domestic scientific literature, the workis devoted to the issue of business'senvironmental responsibility in the context of solving the sustainable development tasks (Danylyshyn et al, 2007); in article (Kostetska et al, 2021) is noted that the increase in the interdependence of the economic growth processes and ecological decline actualizes the task of scientific search for "motivated ways of transition of the traditional, extensive by its nature market economy, i.e. the entire economic system (both within the national framework and within the global economy), to a "green", ecologically safe economy"; social entrepreneurship is considered as a tool of interaction between institutions of public society and government on the basis of inclusiveness.…”

Problems and Prospects of Human Capital Development in Post-Industrial Society

“…The economic and society conversion totaled by the scientific and information revolutions causes the demand for the incomparable and particular type of worker. In this context, such present employee characteristics as originality, expressiveness, resourcefulness, creative power and skills, elasticity, ingeniousness, innovativeness, introspection and high professionalism are in demand (Kostetska, Gordiichuk, Movchaniuk, Vdovenko, Nahornyi, & Koval, 2021). The twenty-first-century worker will achieve high results if he has the ability to quickly and effectively respond to constantly changing external and internal working conditions.…”