Inclusive education in progress: policy evolution in four European countries

Abstract

This paper seeks to compare the evolution of inclusive education policy in the four countries of an EU-funded research project (QualiTYDES) operating under the shared policy environment of the UN, EU and European Commission. A shared policy cannot of course be assumed to result in common legislative or provisional outcomes at national level. The different sociocultural, political, historical and economic contexts in each country shape its journey towards 'compliance' with an international convention (both pre-and post-ratification), and neither the route nor the destination can be assumed to be shared, given the scope for different interpretations of the same texts. This paper places the implementation trajectories of four European countries side by side as they attempt to move towards 'inclusive' education systems. Following a brief overview of the international education policy environment relating to the education of people with disabilities, we describe the national education policy responses in Ireland, Austria, Spain and Czech Republic in recent decades, including both legislation pertaining to special educational need and implementation of policies in practice. The comparison highlights the different manifestations of inclusive education current in each country, and also explores the challenges which have arisen as individual countries attempt to align international policy with provision in existing education systems, each with their own legacy interests, pressures and priorities. Examples of 'gaps' in this alignment are where learners with disabilities/SEN are likely to be failed, and represent the critical points at which barriers to fully inclusive education arise and negatively impact opportunity over the life course.

Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality

“…Even the practice of the narrow approach to inclusion varies a lot, and does not reflect the ideal definition as presented here. In all countries, there is a gap between formulations and realizations of inclusive education (Graham and Jahnukainen 2011;Göransson and Nilholm 2014;Nes 2010;Smyth et al 2014). Changes are slow, few and there are many setbacks.…”

Cognitive Conflict Strategy and Simulation Practicum to Overcome Student Misconception on Light Topics

“…Education is one important aspect that supports the progress of a country. Quality education will produce quality human resources [1]. Physical learning in high school is usually only presented in abstract concepts and difficult to understand.…”

Inclusive education in Georgia: current trends and challenges

“…Even the UK education system experiences problems associated with under‐qualified staff, rigid and inappropriate curricula, underdeveloped IEPs and insufficient use of information and communication (Wright, ). Research undertaken in European countries reports gaps between legislation and practice: legislation requires a higher level of inclusive education than can be observed in practice (Goransson et al, ; Smith et al, ).…”