2022
DOI: 10.1111/area.12828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive LGBTQ+ fieldwork: Advancing spaces of belonging and safety

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teri also emphasized the issue of safety regarding working in various regions of the country. As a queer geoscientist, Teri has to be aware of her access to healthcare and increased potential of harm if working in areas which are known to be unwelcome to members of the LGBTQ+ communities (Mogk, 2021;Zebracki and Greatrick, 2022;Downen and Olcott, 2023;Kamran and Jennings, 2023). James added to this point through his personal experience of safety related to working in various regions of the country, "I would never go out into the field alone.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teri also emphasized the issue of safety regarding working in various regions of the country. As a queer geoscientist, Teri has to be aware of her access to healthcare and increased potential of harm if working in areas which are known to be unwelcome to members of the LGBTQ+ communities (Mogk, 2021;Zebracki and Greatrick, 2022;Downen and Olcott, 2023;Kamran and Jennings, 2023). James added to this point through his personal experience of safety related to working in various regions of the country, "I would never go out into the field alone.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many recent studies consider the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) individuals doing fieldwork, finding that 55% of LGBTQ+ scientists have felt unsafe during fieldwork (Olcott & Downen, 2020). Many of these studies have focused on fieldwork in locations with anti‐LGBTQ+ laws (Atchison, 2021) and on the struggle of deciding whether to be “out” in the field (Mackay & Bishop, 2022; Zebracki & Greatrick, 2022). One recent study makes recommendations for principal investigators to ensure safety of TGD individuals in ecological fieldwork (Matsuda, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critiques of racialised, masculinist, colonial, heterosexist, cis-normative, and ableist assumptions embedded in historical practices and imaginaries of fieldwork are so well-rehearsed that they hardly need repeating (Domosh, 1991;Oswin, 2020;Rose, 1993). However, assuming that fieldwork is inherently masculinist is reductive and creates its own oppressive politics (Bracken and Mawdsley, 2004;Zebracki and Greatrick, 2022). In recent years, field practices in geography have expanded significantly, and exciting new pathways for approaching increasingly diverse fields have emerged (Hawkins, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%