2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income and outcome in myelodysplastic syndrome: The prognostic impact of SES in a single-payer system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When specific outcomes were studied, in contrast to the study by England et al, (2013), we were unable to demonstrate leukaemic-transformation as being more frequent in patients of higher SES. Since all MDS patients in Tayside are treated within NHS Tayside hospitals, the possibility of referral patterns introducing bias in 16 the Canadian study should be considered.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When specific outcomes were studied, in contrast to the study by England et al, (2013), we were unable to demonstrate leukaemic-transformation as being more frequent in patients of higher SES. Since all MDS patients in Tayside are treated within NHS Tayside hospitals, the possibility of referral patterns introducing bias in 16 the Canadian study should be considered.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…In keeping with observations from other studies (Wang et al, 2009;England et al, 2013), no cytogenetic features or MDS risk scores are unique to patients within specific SES quintiles. Oncogenic gene mutations believed to drive the disease process in MDS also do not have an obvious association with SES when genes are grouped according to function: mutations in genes responsible for RNA splicing, regulation of the epigenome or transcription were equally represented in patients from different SES.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A study based on SEER data from the United States found higher mortality in MDS patients from low‐ or medium‐income areas compared to high‐income areas 11 . However, smaller studies from Minnesota, 12 Maryland, 13 Ontario 14 and Scotland, 15 have failed to replicate this finding, and authors have suggested that the reported differences in the larger US study could derive from unequal access to primary care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%