Income Distributions, Inequality, and Poverty in Asia, 199222010

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in Asian Development Bank InstituteThe Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI's working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Authors Chotikapanich, Griffiths, and Rao gratefully acknowledge research funding support from the Australian Research Council through Discovery Project DP1094632.The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms.Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building 8F 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6008, Japan AbstractIncome distributions for developing countries in Asia are modeled using beta-2 distributions, which are estimated by a method of moments procedure applied to grouped data. Estimated parameters of these distributions are used to calculate measures of inequality, poverty, and pro-poor growth in four time periods over 1992-2010. Changes in these measures are examined for 11 countries, with a major focus on the People's Republic of China (PRC), India, and Indonesia, which are separated into rural and urban regions. We find that the PRC has grown rapidly with increasing inequality accompanying this growth. India has been relatively stagnant. Indonesia has grown rapidly after suffering an initial set back from the Asian financial crisis in 1997.

The triptych migration-inward FDI-inequality in South Asian countries: How much do governance and institutions matter?

“…India is one of the world's most densely populated countries. An estimated GDP (PPP constant 2005 international $) of 3.77 trillion dollars in 2010 has enabled India to be one of the world's largest economies (Chotikapanich, Griffiths, Rao, & Karunarathne, 2014). There was also a pronounced increase in India's inequality between 1993 and 2004.…”

“…In fact, manufacturing industries and skilled labor are heavily concentrated in large urban areas, leading to unequal distribution of capital, income and basic infrastructure facilities between regions (OECD, 2010). Inequality measured by the Gini coefficient increased slightly from .31 to .33 over the period 1992-2010, indicating that India's inequality has kept relatively low, stable and under control (Chotikapanich et al, 2014). Besides placing greater emphasis on the inclusive growth, the aim of ensuring equality of opportunity has been affirmed in the Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2007-2012) launched by the Indian government (ADB, 2012).…”

Food Security in South Asia: Status, Challenges and Policy Considerations

“…Economic growth in South Asia was relatively slow during the 1970s and 1980s, but growth has accelerated over the last two decades, except in Afghanistan and Pakistan where economy has sufered from political factors. However, economic inequality has increased with faster economic growth (Chotikapanich et al 2014;Osmani and Sen 2011). Low-income economies did not beneit as much from economic growth due to inequality in the access to opportunities and resources, and poor quality of human resources.…”

Linkage Between Poverty, Inequality, and Income Distribution: A Case on Bannu District, Pakistan

“…Over last two decades, from 1989 to 2013, the People's Republic of China had an average growth rate of 9.8% per annum. Similarly, India's annual average growth rate was 9% from 2003 to 2007, and Indonesia has had a 6% annual average growth rate since 2006 (Bag & Gupta, 2012;Chotikapanich, Griffiths, & Karunarathne, 2014;Felipe, Lanzafame, & Zhuang, 2014;Nagaraj, 2013). China has the second largest economy in the world, and India has the fifth largest economy in the world as well as the fourth largest market in the world.…”