2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1365100512000028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income Inequality, Mobility, and the Welfare State: A Political Economy Model

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Bossi et al (2013Bossi et al ( : 1199, there are multiplicities of programs under the welfare state in high-income industrialized countries that promotes redistribution and provides social insurance programs for the population. ''Some programs are designed specifically to target inequalities between the rich and the poor, whereas others aim to cope with variations in income over the life cycle''.…”
Section: Dependent Variables: Poverty and Income Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bossi et al (2013Bossi et al ( : 1199, there are multiplicities of programs under the welfare state in high-income industrialized countries that promotes redistribution and provides social insurance programs for the population. ''Some programs are designed specifically to target inequalities between the rich and the poor, whereas others aim to cope with variations in income over the life cycle''.…”
Section: Dependent Variables: Poverty and Income Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related models have been proposed, among others, by Casamatta et al (2000); Conde-Ruiz and Galasso (2005); Cremer et al (2007);Hassler et al (2007) and Bossi and Gumus (2012). The basic novelty in these models is that individuals do not only differ in terms of age (workers v.s pensioners) but also with respect to their income.…”
Section: Repeated Voting With Altruism and Intra-generational Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soares (2011) compares voter choices within redistributive (Beveridgean) and earnings-based (Bismarckian) arrangements. With a similar restriction, Bossi and Gumus (2013) examine the choice between intra- and intergenerational transfers in light of inequality and mobility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%