2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05407-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy nations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
260
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
15
260
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not observe an association between social trust and country-level variation in TB, a finding in agreement with some previous studies [15,47]. Although it has been suggested elsewhere that income inequality leads to more violence, less social cohesion and lower levels of social trust [20], it appears that the mechanism, through which income inequality influences TB outcomes, is not related to social trust.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We did not observe an association between social trust and country-level variation in TB, a finding in agreement with some previous studies [15,47]. Although it has been suggested elsewhere that income inequality leads to more violence, less social cohesion and lower levels of social trust [20], it appears that the mechanism, through which income inequality influences TB outcomes, is not related to social trust.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…25,26,29,30 In comparison with wealthy nations, associations between neighborhood characteristics and different health outcomes were inconsistent. 31 This implies that neighborhood determinants of health are complex. Such determinants may include access to healthcare, education and social services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature and meaning of this association continues to be vigorously debated (Gravelle, 1998) (Wolfson, Kaplan, Lynch, Ross & Backlund, 1999) (Wilkinson, 1999) (Lynch et al, 2000) (Marmot & Wilkinson, 2001) (Lynch, Davey Smith, Hillemeier, Shaw, Raghunathan & Kaplan, 2001) (Mackenbach, 2002) (Lynch, Davey Smith, Harper, Hillemeier, Ross, Kaplan & Wolfson, 2004).…”
Section: Objective or Subjective Status -Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%