2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01538.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income splitting, specialization, and intra‐family distribution

Abstract: Income splitting for tax purposes results in more specialization of wives, but does this in turn generate more gender inequality? In my dynamic bargaining model with a divorce threatpoint, I find that who controls the couple's labour supply plays a crucial role in establishing this link. If spouses choose their labour supply non-cooperatively, only the husband's increase -but not her own decrease -in labour supply introduces a negative term in the wife's change in welfare. If the wife does not control her own … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the literature on the optimal taxation of the family has typically Some recent literature has departed from the assumption of a unitary decision-maker in modeling optimal tax policy or the welfare consequences of tax reforms (e.g. Alesina, Ichino, and Karabarbounis 2011; Apps and Rees 1988;Apps and Rees 1999;Craig Brett 1998;Chiappori 1992;Olivier Donni 2003;Elisabeth Gugl 2009). My results are supportive of a key prediction of the Alesina, Ichino, and Karabarbounis (2011) model-that women's labor supply should be more elastic than men's-even in Sweden where gender di¤erences in labor market outcomes are arguably less dramatic than elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the literature on the optimal taxation of the family has typically Some recent literature has departed from the assumption of a unitary decision-maker in modeling optimal tax policy or the welfare consequences of tax reforms (e.g. Alesina, Ichino, and Karabarbounis 2011; Apps and Rees 1988;Apps and Rees 1999;Craig Brett 1998;Chiappori 1992;Olivier Donni 2003;Elisabeth Gugl 2009). My results are supportive of a key prediction of the Alesina, Ichino, and Karabarbounis (2011) model-that women's labor supply should be more elastic than men's-even in Sweden where gender di¤erences in labor market outcomes are arguably less dramatic than elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 This can, but need not, be rationalised in terms of a Nash bargaining analysis of household resource allocation. See, for example, Gugl (2009). It would result from just about any model in which the weight given to an (adult) individual's well-being in the household increases with their net-of-tax wage rate, as in the exchange model of Apps (1982) and the non-cooperative models of Lommerud (1995, 2000), or indeed earnings, as in the game-theoretic model of Basu (2006).…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also Rees (1999a, 2007) for models with household production. Gugl (2009) analyzes the effects of income splitting on intrahousehold distribution.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%