1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.1996.tb00246.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income Support and Staying in School: What Can We Learn from Australia's AUSTUDY Experiment?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In England, primary school children have the option of bringing a packed lunch from home, or paying for a school meal. Under the current policy all children up to seven years are eligible for a free school meal, with 85% of families electing for children to receive a school provided meal rather than providing a packed lunch [23]. Beyond the age of seven, parents have to pay approximately £2 pounds/AU$3.50 per day, and the uptake in school lunches varies from 34 to 99 percent [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In England, primary school children have the option of bringing a packed lunch from home, or paying for a school meal. Under the current policy all children up to seven years are eligible for a free school meal, with 85% of families electing for children to receive a school provided meal rather than providing a packed lunch [23]. Beyond the age of seven, parents have to pay approximately £2 pounds/AU$3.50 per day, and the uptake in school lunches varies from 34 to 99 percent [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which this essentially unprecedented situation will result in competition between educational and labour-force institutions for youthful participants has yet seen very little investigation; Easterlin (1988) raised similar issues theoretically. However, there are strong indications that at least some of the recent increase in tertiary student numbers has reflected hidden unemployment, rather than a true upsurge in tertiary participation (Dearden and Heath 1995;Lewis and Koshy 1999). The trends in Figure 4 could thus well foreshadow a decline in university and other tertiary student numbers, emerging first in the oldest regions while in the youngest regions numbers will still be increasing.…”
Section: Regionality In the Effect Of Population Ageing On Educationamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The evaluation also attempted to ascertain whether a young person from a low-income household was more likely to participate in post-compulsory education as a result of changes made to benefit regulations for both students and the unemployed. The evaluation showed that, over the 1989-1993 period, participation rates among young people from less financially privileged backgrounds had increased by between 3.5 and 4 percentage points as a result of the initiative (Dearden and Heath 1996).…”
Section: Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%