2015
DOI: 10.1021/jp510615j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incommensurate Growth of Thin and Ultrathin Films of Single-Phase Fe3O4(001) on SrTiO3(001)

Abstract: We present structural, electronic, and morphological characterization of thin (7.5 nm, 9 unit cells) and ultrathin (1.7 nm, 2 unit cells) Fe3O4 layers grown on SrTiO3(001) by oxygen assisted molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) methods. The analysis show single-phase single oriented (001) layers that grow forming a coincidence lattice of the order 13. Such an incommensurate growth is present for all the layers, independent of the evaporation method and layer thickness. The magnetite l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The layer thicknesses are calculated by fitting the low angle reflectivity and complemented by atomic force microscopy (AFM), giving roughness values of ca. 1.5 nm, for the Au layer and 0.8 nm for the Fe 3 O 4 layer as reported previously [15]. Thus, we present a heterostructure composed by Fe 3 O 4 10 nm and Au 7 nm, but similar results were obtained varying Au thickness from 1 nm to ca.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The layer thicknesses are calculated by fitting the low angle reflectivity and complemented by atomic force microscopy (AFM), giving roughness values of ca. 1.5 nm, for the Au layer and 0.8 nm for the Fe 3 O 4 layer as reported previously [15]. Thus, we present a heterostructure composed by Fe 3 O 4 10 nm and Au 7 nm, but similar results were obtained varying Au thickness from 1 nm to ca.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This matching implies an incommensurate growth of Au and Fe 3 O 4 . Regarding Fe 3 O 4 , it can be explained by the existence of a coincidence lattice of order 13 with the STO substrate, which has been previously reported [15]. In the case of the Au, it grows in identical conditions, but displaying a coincidence lattice of order 35 with the magnetite (35a(Au) = 17a (Fe 3 O 4 )).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the large lattice mismatch of -7.5% between the doubled SrTiO 3 bulk lattice constant (0.3905 nm) and magnetite at least some of the thin films appear to grow almost relaxed on the SrTiO 3 (001) surface, 25,28 hence the reason of the altered magnetic properties including the role of epitaxial strain and potential formation of anti-phase domain boundaries (APB's) is still under discussion. As to coupled Fe 3 O 4 /NiO bilayers grown on SrTiO 3 , up to now only Pilard et al report on the magnetic properties of the NiO/Fe 3 O 4 interface.…”
Section: 27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorption profiles obtained by XANES measurements at the Fe K-edge of heterostructures follow the absorption features of powder α-Fe2O3 reference (see Figure 5a). Fitting the XANES spectra by a linear combination of different iron oxide reference compounds (Fe, FeO, Fe3O4 and α-Fe2O3 references) [37,38][paper CSP SFOAAG] (not shown) confirms an oxidation state of Fe3+ and a 100 % of α-Fe2O3 phase in both α-Fe2O3 layer and Au/ α-Fe2O3 bilayer grown on STO(111) substrate, corroborating the α-Fe2O3 phase as single iron oxide phase before and after the deposition of Au islands.…”
Section: Morphological and Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%