2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete fusion in 16O+159Tb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The review on ICF by Gerschel et al [20] suggested that the localization of the ℓ window depends on the target deformation. The localization of the ℓ window has also been reported in the spin distribution measurements [21][22][23]. The most widely used theoretical models to explain the ICF are the (i) SUM RULE model [24,25], (ii) break-up fusion model [26], (iii) exciton model [27], (iv) hot-spot model [28], (v) promptly emitted particles model [29], (vi) overlap model [30][31][32][33], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The review on ICF by Gerschel et al [20] suggested that the localization of the ℓ window depends on the target deformation. The localization of the ℓ window has also been reported in the spin distribution measurements [21][22][23]. The most widely used theoretical models to explain the ICF are the (i) SUM RULE model [24,25], (ii) break-up fusion model [26], (iii) exciton model [27], (iv) hot-spot model [28], (v) promptly emitted particles model [29], (vi) overlap model [30][31][32][33], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In order to have a better and clearer picture about the dynamics of ICF reactions, the onset and strength of the ICF component is studied with the various entrance channel parameters viz., (i) projectile energy; (ii) input angular momenta; (iii) α-Q value of the projectile, which corresponds to the alpha particle binding energy of the projectile; (iv) binding energy of the projectile; (v) mass-asymmetry; and (vi) Coulomb effect. Recently, high-quality data on excitation functions (EFs) [9,[34][35][36], spin distributions [21][22][23], and recoil range distributions [37][38][39] of individual reaction products have been obtained in a variety of experiments performed at the Inter University Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi, which clearly indicates the presence of ICF at low energies but is limited to a few projectile-target combinations only. In this present work, EFs for a large number of reaction residues populated in the interaction of 19 F+ 169 Tm systems have been measured at energies ≈4-6 MeV/nucleon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where μ is the reduced mass, E is the center of mass energy of projectile and V c is the Coulomb barrier, and (ii) mass asymmetry of the system, μ A = M T −M P M T +M P where M T and M P is the mass of target and projectile respectively, for different projectile-target combinations [54,55,[64][65][66]. In figure 7, the ratio are plotted as a function of (a) relative velocity (v rel ), and (b) mass asymmetry of the system (μ A ).…”
Section: Localization Of -Window and Entrance-channel Dependence Of Icfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 9(a), the projectile-target combinations are shown by different symbols-filled circles represent 12 C + 169 Tm at E lab ≈ 67-90 MeV (present work and [55]), half-filled circles represent 16 O + 159 Tb at E lab ≈ 83-97 MeV [65], filled square represents 16 O + 169 Tm at E lab ≈ 87.6 MeV [54], filled hexagon represents 16 O + 154 Sm [66], and half-filled square represents 16 O + 124 Sn [64] at E lab ≈ 97.6 MeV. As can be seen from this figure, there is a linear increase in the value of ratio with v rel for 12 C + 169 Tm and 16 O + 159 Tb.…”
Section: Localization Of -Window and Entrance-channel Dependence Of Icfmentioning
confidence: 99%