2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2794176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete Menu Preference and Ambiguity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chandrasekher [2014] proposes a generalization of the random Strotz model, weakening the assumption that preferences are complete while retaining the NDC axiom. The overlap of the model in Chandrasekher [2014] with the self-regulation model is the random Strotz model. Masatlioglu, Nakajima, and Ozdenoren [2017] generalize the Strotz model by allowing the DM to resist internal conflicts subject to her willpower stock.…”
Section: Other Related Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chandrasekher [2014] proposes a generalization of the random Strotz model, weakening the assumption that preferences are complete while retaining the NDC axiom. The overlap of the model in Chandrasekher [2014] with the self-regulation model is the random Strotz model. Masatlioglu, Nakajima, and Ozdenoren [2017] generalize the Strotz model by allowing the DM to resist internal conflicts subject to her willpower stock.…”
Section: Other Related Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%