2003
DOI: 10.1149/1.1588303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete Wetting of Nanoscale Thin-Film Structures

Abstract: With each new generation of integrated circuits and other nanostructured devices produced at ever-decreasing length scales, the extension of liquid-phase processes for the manufacturing of these devices is uncertain. The current work investigates the ability of liquids to wet nanoscale features. A model for wetting time is derived that may be used to identify those geometries for which wetting is critical. Conditions under which wetting time is significant may result in low yield and poor uniformity and may re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows X-SEM images of the pillar profiles, from which the pillars dimensions and the geometric factors defined in Eq. [1][2][3] were measured (summarized in Table I). Different treatments were applied to the test structures to vapor adsorptions of decamethyl tetrasiloxane (θ ≈ 70°) and dodecamethyl pentasiloxane (θ ≈ 85°), HMDS-priming (hexamethyldisilazane, θ ≈ 80.5°, on a TEL-Track), vapor phase deposited self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of PEO (polyethyleneoxide, θ ≈ 30°), CUTS (11-cyanoundecyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 70°), PETS (phenethyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 83°), BUTS (11-bromoundecyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 97°) and FDTS (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 110°).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 shows X-SEM images of the pillar profiles, from which the pillars dimensions and the geometric factors defined in Eq. [1][2][3] were measured (summarized in Table I). Different treatments were applied to the test structures to vapor adsorptions of decamethyl tetrasiloxane (θ ≈ 70°) and dodecamethyl pentasiloxane (θ ≈ 85°), HMDS-priming (hexamethyldisilazane, θ ≈ 80.5°, on a TEL-Track), vapor phase deposited self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of PEO (polyethyleneoxide, θ ≈ 30°), CUTS (11-cyanoundecyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 70°), PETS (phenethyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 83°), BUTS (11-bromoundecyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 97°) and FDTS (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltrichlorosilane, θ ≈ 110°).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetting of patterned structures has for long not been considered as an issue. The classical view is that aqueous processing of patterned structures is limited by hydrophobic surfaces (θ > 90˚) and long processing times of large size features (1). The former issue is usually tackled by the addition of surfactants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such wet cleaning, the surface should be covered by the liquid prior to cleaning. However, in some cases, it is not easy to fully cover fine structures with the liquid (Spuller and Hess, 2003). This could be because surface tension prevents the interface from deforming as necessary (De Gennes et al, 2004), the material to be cleaned has poor wettability, or dead-end structures do not allow gas to escape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 As the wetting time decreased along with the volume to be wetted, perspectives look positive in this respect. However recent studies have shown that even inherently hydrophilic surfaces (θ < 90…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%