2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inconsistent PCR detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: Insights from whole genome sequence analyses

Abstract: Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have been linked to food-borne disease outbreaks. As PCR is routinely used to screen foods for STEC, it is important that factors leading to inconsistent detection of STEC by PCR are understood. This study used whole genome sequencing (WGS) to investigate causes of inconsistent PCR detection of stx1, stx2, and serogroup-specific genes. Fifty strains isolated from Alberta feedlot cattle from three different studies were selected with inconsistent or consistent detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of serotyping, we found some discordant results between both techniques used and some discrepancies could also be observed in the results obtained when assigning the serogroup by serology or when doing so using the Serotype Finder. The same occurred when Castro et al compared PCR and WGS results to define E. coli serogroups ( Castro et al, 2021 ). Some hypotheses to explain these discrepancies in our study are that we are dealing with new variants or new serogroups not yet described, and therefore not updated in the database used, or strains that cross-react with sera from other serogroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…At the time of serotyping, we found some discordant results between both techniques used and some discrepancies could also be observed in the results obtained when assigning the serogroup by serology or when doing so using the Serotype Finder. The same occurred when Castro et al compared PCR and WGS results to define E. coli serogroups ( Castro et al, 2021 ). Some hypotheses to explain these discrepancies in our study are that we are dealing with new variants or new serogroups not yet described, and therefore not updated in the database used, or strains that cross-react with sera from other serogroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Resistance to several antibiotics may be attributed to the presence of certain genes, such as mcr-mediated colistin resistance and/ or plasmids from the incF and incX groups, among other factors (SAIDENBERG et al, 2020;ZAMPARETTE et al, 2020;CASTRO et al, 2021). These genes and plasmids have been previously detected in E. coli isolated from clinical and food samples in Brazil (SAIDENBERG et al, 2020;ZAMPARETTE et al, 2020) as well as in bovine faeces in Canada (CASTRO et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the importance of using validated pipelines for stx gene identification to mitigate the risk of misidentification when multiple copies of the gene are present (55,60). Complementing short-read data with long-read sequencing or the use of read-mapping strategies should be considered whenever the presence of multiple gene copies, or fragments of the gene sequence (61), in a chromosome is a possibility. Two STEC strains were found to possess previously unreported variants of established stx2 subtypes (BMH-17-0027 O8:H28 stx2a; BMH-17-0036 O146:H21 stx2b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%