2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00289-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

13
131
2
15

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
131
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The opposite position has, however, also been advanced, suggesting that satisfaction mediates between commitment and turnover (see Tett & Meyer, 1993). Antecedents of both constructs are remarkably similar (e. g., job characteristics; DeConinck & Stilwell, 2004;Grebner et al, 2003), and no strong case can be made for a causal precedence of one of these attitudes over the other conceptually.The argument that leavers sever their ties with the organization but may take on very similar jobs (Porter et al, 1976) is, of course, plausible, but so is the reverse: People may dislike their immediate job and leave, not only to get away from the organization but to get better job conditions. Empirically, meta-analyses (e. g., Chang, Rosen, & Levy, 2009;Tett & Meyer, 1993) have concluded that job satisfaction and organizational commitment both contribute to turnover (or turnover intentions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The opposite position has, however, also been advanced, suggesting that satisfaction mediates between commitment and turnover (see Tett & Meyer, 1993). Antecedents of both constructs are remarkably similar (e. g., job characteristics; DeConinck & Stilwell, 2004;Grebner et al, 2003), and no strong case can be made for a causal precedence of one of these attitudes over the other conceptually.The argument that leavers sever their ties with the organization but may take on very similar jobs (Porter et al, 1976) is, of course, plausible, but so is the reverse: People may dislike their immediate job and leave, not only to get away from the organization but to get better job conditions. Empirically, meta-analyses (e. g., Chang, Rosen, & Levy, 2009;Tett & Meyer, 1993) have concluded that job satisfaction and organizational commitment both contribute to turnover (or turnover intentions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite position has, however, also been advanced, suggesting that satisfaction mediates between commitment and turnover (see Tett & Meyer, 1993). Antecedents of both constructs are remarkably similar (e. g., job characteristics; DeConinck & Stilwell, 2004;Grebner et al, 2003), and no strong case can be made for a causal precedence of one of these attitudes over the other conceptually.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos anteriores referentes a relação entre Burnout e Justiça no ambiente organizacional afirmam a existência de uma série de consequência não desejadas como inerente dos reflexos do Burnout na percepção de Justiça e vice versa, tais como Alcoolismo (Kouvonen et al, 2008); Exaustão Emocional (Cole, Bernerth, Walter, & Holt, 2010); Problemas no sono e Stress Emocional (Elovainio et al, 2009); Ansiedade (Elovainio, Kivimaki, Vahtera, Virtanen, & Keltikangas-Jarvinen, 2003); Dificuldade de comprometimento (Deconinck & Stilwell, 2004;Paz-Vega, 2009;Heponiemi, Kuusio, Sinervo & Elovainio, 2011); Redução de produtividade (Paz-Vega, 2009;Heponiemi et al, 2007;Devonish & Greenidge, 2010;Husted & Folger, 2004); Comportamentos negativos no ambiente de trabalho (Deconinck & Stilwell, 2004); Turn Over (Sora, Caballer, Peiro, Silla & Gracia, 2010;Elovainio et al, 2011;Cole et al, 2010;Parker & Kohlmeyer, 2005) entre outras consequências que podem influenciar nas metas e objetivos organizacionais, bem como em demais aspectos da vida dos indivíduos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…To appreciate organizational justice is vital for organizations because organizational justice is important for employees' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention to quit (DeConinck & Stilwell 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%