2021
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating Silages into Preweaned Dairy Calf Diets

Abstract: Supplementing forage to preweaned calves has shown some positive effects, such as stabilization of the rumen environment, limiting abnormal behaviors, and increasing starter intake. However, dry forages can be limited and cost prohibitive in some areas of the world. Contrastingly, ensiled forages are commonly found on most dairy farms and are low cost. Therefore, the objective of this review was to focus specifically on ensiled forages and how they affect preweaned calves. There are few studies that have focus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
(157 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there has been increased interest in studies incorporating silages into pre-weaning calf rations because of their widespread availability on dairy farms and their lower cost as compared to dry forage (Kehoe et al, 2021). The majority of these studies focused on maize silage (Overest et al, 2016;Mirzaei et al, 2017;Kehoe et al, 2019), while others focused on alfalfa silage (Khan et al, 2020) and triticale silage (Castells et al, 2012(Castells et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Source and Level Of Foragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been increased interest in studies incorporating silages into pre-weaning calf rations because of their widespread availability on dairy farms and their lower cost as compared to dry forage (Kehoe et al, 2021). The majority of these studies focused on maize silage (Overest et al, 2016;Mirzaei et al, 2017;Kehoe et al, 2019), while others focused on alfalfa silage (Khan et al, 2020) and triticale silage (Castells et al, 2012(Castells et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Source and Level Of Foragementioning
confidence: 99%