2009
DOI: 10.1145/1534480.1534481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating system-level concepts into undergraduate embedded systems curricula

Abstract: As more and more embedded systems concepts are integrated into academic curricula, the incorporation of system-level concepts must keep pace with lower-level topics. However, there are several challenges faced by educators trying to integrate systemlevel concepts into embedded systems curricula. Four such challenges include: the breadth of the embedded systems field limits opportunities for system-level content; lack of adequate laboratory platforms addressing system-level alternatives; limited student exposur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings made in this study support the result discussed in the relevant literature, particularly specialties for computer science education postulated for school such as problem solving and algorithmic thinking (Fadi & McHugh, 2000;Muller & Haberman, 2008), system-level-perspective (Gal-Ezer & Zeldes, 2000;Ricks & Jackson, 2009), modeling (Mühling, Hubwieser, & Brinda, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The findings made in this study support the result discussed in the relevant literature, particularly specialties for computer science education postulated for school such as problem solving and algorithmic thinking (Fadi & McHugh, 2000;Muller & Haberman, 2008), system-level-perspective (Gal-Ezer & Zeldes, 2000;Ricks & Jackson, 2009), modeling (Mühling, Hubwieser, & Brinda, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results of this study support the relevant literature, particularly concerning problem solving and algorithmic thinking (Fadi & McHugh, 2001, Muller & Haberman, 2008, system-level-perspective (Gal-Ezer & Zeldes, 2000;Ricks & Jackson, 2009), modelling (Mühling, Hubwieser, & Brinda 2010). They can be used for consolidating available curricular drafts for computer science as a teaching subject at school of the type available in many countries or currently in the state of revision, e.g., for England and Wales, Scotland, the USA, Israel, New Zealand, Germany, India, South Korea, Greece.…”
Section: International Journal Of Research Studies In Computingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results of this study support findings discussed in the literature-and especially the call for computer science education in schools to focus on specific core areas: problem solving and algorithmic thinking (Fadi & McHugh, 2001;Muller & Haberman, 2008); system-level perspective (Gal-Ezer & Zeldes, 2000;Ricks & Jackson, 2009); and linking theory and practice (Armoni & Gal-Ezer, 2007;Loidl, Müjlbacher, & Schaver, 2005;Pelleh, Haberman, Rosenthal, & English, 2008).…”
Section: Pre-service Teachers Of Computer Sciencesupporting
confidence: 84%