2021
DOI: 10.1108/ijlm-06-2020-0225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating the risk of knowledge loss in supply chain risk management

Abstract: PurposeThe literature on supply chain risk management (SCRM) has investigated a multitude of supply chain risks. This paper aims to make a case for the importance of managing the risk of knowledge loss in the supply chain management (SCM) function and incorporating knowledge loss as a critical risk within the SCRM process.Design/methodology/approachThis paper adopts a knowledge-based view of the SCRM process and attempts to bring to light insights based on a synthesis of the relevant literature. The authors co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Area of KLT research Departing points (selected references) Future research opportunities Daghfous et al (2021), Durst & Wilhelm (2013), Jain (2022), Kumar & Yakhlef (2016), Leon et al (2017) stakeholders (e.g. customers, suppliers, investors, academic partners) with respect to performance, operations, organizational routines and innovation capabilities Coping mechanisms Bendapudi & Leone (2002), Stark & Head (2019) Identifying new mechanisms, methods and tools allowing for coping with KLT and mitigating its negative effects de Holan & Phillips ( 2004), Klammer & Gueldenberg (2020), L opez & Sune (2013), Wensley & Navarro (2015) Exploring if, when, how and by whom external knowledge repositories can be used for reconfiguring organizational knowledge flows after KLT Understanding how unlearning (intentional knowledge loss) can contribute to coping with KLT and how organisational capabilities for such unlearning should be developed Exploring joint dynamics of learning, unlearning and re-learning which could contribute to effective coping with KLT Massingham (2014a, 2014b, Levallet & Chan (2019) Evaluating effectiveness of the developed mechanisms and approaches Preventive mechanisms Girard (2005), Olander & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen (2015), Souto & Bruno-Faria (2022) Developing strategic approaches to prevent KLT Advancing current understanding of how managers could be encouraged to initiate developing such strategic approaches by studying their perceptions of KLT and needs for developing strategies aimed at KLT prevention Massingham (2014aMassingham ( , 2014b, Massingham & Massingham (2014) Evaluating effectiveness of the developed mechanisms and approaches Chandra et al (2015), Leon et al (2017), Parise (2007), Parise et al (2006)…”
Section: Tlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area of KLT research Departing points (selected references) Future research opportunities Daghfous et al (2021), Durst & Wilhelm (2013), Jain (2022), Kumar & Yakhlef (2016), Leon et al (2017) stakeholders (e.g. customers, suppliers, investors, academic partners) with respect to performance, operations, organizational routines and innovation capabilities Coping mechanisms Bendapudi & Leone (2002), Stark & Head (2019) Identifying new mechanisms, methods and tools allowing for coping with KLT and mitigating its negative effects de Holan & Phillips ( 2004), Klammer & Gueldenberg (2020), L opez & Sune (2013), Wensley & Navarro (2015) Exploring if, when, how and by whom external knowledge repositories can be used for reconfiguring organizational knowledge flows after KLT Understanding how unlearning (intentional knowledge loss) can contribute to coping with KLT and how organisational capabilities for such unlearning should be developed Exploring joint dynamics of learning, unlearning and re-learning which could contribute to effective coping with KLT Massingham (2014a, 2014b, Levallet & Chan (2019) Evaluating effectiveness of the developed mechanisms and approaches Preventive mechanisms Girard (2005), Olander & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen (2015), Souto & Bruno-Faria (2022) Developing strategic approaches to prevent KLT Advancing current understanding of how managers could be encouraged to initiate developing such strategic approaches by studying their perceptions of KLT and needs for developing strategies aimed at KLT prevention Massingham (2014aMassingham ( , 2014b, Massingham & Massingham (2014) Evaluating effectiveness of the developed mechanisms and approaches Chandra et al (2015), Leon et al (2017), Parise (2007), Parise et al (2006)…”
Section: Tlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction, through an empirical study, Creazza et al (2021) emphasize the importance of managers' perception and how this may influence the decisionmaking within a chain. However, due to employee turnover, there may be knowledge loss by the company affecting the flow of the supply chain (Daghfous et al 2021), which may be even more concerning when this turnover is related to managing positions.…”
Section: Supply Chain Risk Management (Scrm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (2021) state that knowledge seeking and knowledge generation can help firms to understand market knowledge, government policies and customer needs, which, in turn, improve firms’ technological innovation and supply chain performance. Daghfous et al (2021) incorporate the risk of knowledge loss into supply chain risk management, which implies that the relief supply chain members should be motivated by the government to collaborate closely and share knowledge selflessly, to ensure relief supplies and overcome the public crisis. Liu et al (2019) find that knowledge management practices in China are significantly influenced by institutional forces, implying that the Chinese system can improve knowledge management in the relief supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the Chinese system, there will be a market failure when the market mechanism is only used to accumulate and spread public crisis knowledge and a firm will be subjected to the risk of knowledge loss in its supply chain when it is faced with fierce market competition (Daghfous et al , 2021). To the best of our knowledge, there is little research that focuses on how the Chinese system overcomes the market failure in the relief supply chain from the knowledge management perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%