2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2015.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation of fuzzy spatial relation in temporal mammogram registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper presents a method of extracting temporal change information from temporal mammograms and apply the change information to the detection of malignant masses. This study is an extension of the framework introduced in [16], namely that of registering temporal mammograms based on fuzzy spatial relation representation and graph matching. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents a method of extracting temporal change information from temporal mammograms and apply the change information to the detection of malignant masses. This study is an extension of the framework introduced in [16], namely that of registering temporal mammograms based on fuzzy spatial relation representation and graph matching. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanjay-Gopal et al, Hadjiiski et al, and Filev et al designed computerized methods for interval change analysis, using a regional registration technique to identify corresponding lesions on temporal pairs of mammograms [19,39,40]. In a relatively recent study, Ma et al introduced a method that incorporates fuzzy sets, based on spatial relationships, along with graph matching [41]. Hybrid registration techniques for mammogram matching have also been proposed by Wirth et al, Timp and Karssemeijer, and Li et al [42][43][44].…”
Section: Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many learning-based methods have been proposed for a similar problem, graph matching, such as Zanfir and Sminchisescu [20] , Wang et al [21] , Ma et al [22] , Wu et al [23] , Xu et al [24] , Guo et al [25] , Vento [26] . However, very few learning-based methods have been designed for subgraph matching, except for Sub-GMN [27] and NeuralMatch [28] to our best knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%