BaciUus subtilis strain QB928, a tryptophanauxotroph, was serially mutated to yield strain HR15. For QB928, tryptophan functioned as a competent amino acid and 4-fluorotryptophan as merely an inferior analogue. For HR15, these roles were reversed. The tryptophan/4-fluorotryptophan growth ratio decreased by a factor of 2 x 104 in the transition from QB928 to HR15.The genetic code distributes 64 triplet codons to 20 amino acids and three termination signals for the construction of protein molecules. In the evolution of the code, membership in the ensemble of encoded amino acids may undergo addition, deletion, or replacement; without changing membership, codons also may be redistributed among the amino acids. Purely codonic changes are implicated in the departure of mitochondrial codes from the universal, or mainstream, code (1-3) and occur to a limited extent in missense and nonsense suppressions (4, 5).Whether or not any membership change has ever occurred in the course of biological evolution is more difficult to decide. Constituents of polysaccharides and lipids are varied. Even with nucleic acids, the use of hydroxymethyl-dCTP as substrate for T4 bacteriophage DNA synthesis at least exemplifies a variation. However, prokaryotic, eukaryotic, mitochondrial (6), and chloroplast (7) proteins uniformly utilize the same 20 proteinous amino acids. Thus there is no evidence from extant organisms that the encoded amino acids have ever changed during three billion years of biological evolution, in spite of the selective advantage to be gained from increased variety in amino acid side chains, as witnessed by as many as 120 kinds of posttranslational modifications of proteins (8), and the availability of over 200 kinds of novel amino acids from cellular metabolism (9) for entry into the code. The invariance is also largely not due to protection by the specificity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases; these enzymes distinguish among the 20 incumbent amino acids with extreme fidelity but they permit the incorporation of numerous amino acid analogues into proteins either partially or, in the case of selenomethionine (10) and trifluoroleucine (11), completely in place of an incumbent amino acid. Instead, what appears to be the most powerful barrier stabilizing the code has been the continual optimization of protein sequences on the basis of the incumbent amino acids, such that the replacement of any of them nowadays by an analogue typically brings a steep decline in biological fitness, as measured by cell growth (12,13). This fitness edge has to be not only removed but also reversed in order to achieve a membership change in the code.The coevolution theory of the genetic code proposes that the development of the universal code was inseparably linked to that of pathways for amino acid biosynthesis (14-18). New amino acids formed by primitive catalytic pathways received part or all of the codons of precursor amino acids through pretranslational modification of, or competition against, the precursors. This explains the entry o...